Page 149 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Winter 2015
P. 149

Recent events have shown that, despite the lessons learned from more than 6,800 U.S.
                combat fatalities over the last 13 years, opportunities exist to improve the control of
                external hemorrhage in the civilian sector.





              Editor’s note: The Joint Committee to Create a National   events, no one should die from uncontrolled bleeding.
              Policy to Enhance Survivability from Intentional Mass-  An  acronym  to  summarize  the  necessary  response  is
              Casualty and Active Shooter Events developed the fol-  THREAT:
              lowing call to action at its April 14 meeting in Hartford,
              CT. This committee meeting, chaired by American Col-  •  Threat suppression
              lege of Surgeons (ACS) Regent Lenworth M. Jacobs,   •  Hemorrhage control
              Jr., MD, MPH, FACS, focused on implementation of   •  Rapid Extrication to safety
              strategies for effective hemorrhage control. The delib-  •  Assessment by medical providers
              erations of the group yielded the Hartford Consensus III   •  Transport to definitive care
              document. This report was presented at a White House
              roundtable forum on April 29, which included repre-  The Hartford Consensus calls for a seamless, integrated
              sentatives from 35 medical and surgical, nursing, law   response system that includes the public, law enforce-
              enforcement,  fire,  emergency  medical  services  (EMS),   ment, EMS/fire/rescue, and definitive care to employ the
              and other stakeholder organizations (see pages 22 and   THREAT response in a comprehensive and expeditious
              24 [in The Bulletin Sep 15 issue] for lists of participat-  manner.
              ing organizations and agencies). The participants unani-
              mously endorsed the principles set forth in the Hartford   Three Levels of Responders
              Consensus III. The following is the Hartford Consensus   There are different levels of responders in an intentional
              III, edited to conform with Bulletin style.        mass-casualty or active shooter event:

                  ur nation’s threat from intentional mass-casualty   •  Immediate responders: The individuals who are pres-
                  events remains elevated. Enhancing public resil-  ent at the scene who can immediately control bleeding
             Oience to all such potential hazards has been iden-   with their hands and equipment that may be available
              tified  as  a  priority  for  domestic  preparedness.  Recent   •  Professional first responders: Prehospital responders
              events have shown that, despite the lessons learned from   at the scene who have the appropriate equipment and
              more than 6,800 U.S. combat fatalities over the last 13   training
              years, opportunities exist to improve the control of ex-  •  Trauma professionals: Health care professionals in
              ternal hemorrhage in the civilian sector.* These oppor-  hospitals with all of the necessary equipment and skill
              tunities exist in the form of interventions that should   to provide definitive care
              be  performed  by  bystanders  known  as  immediate  re-
              sponders and professional first responders, such as law   Immediate responders
              enforcement  officers,  emergency  medical  technicians   One goal of the Hartford Consensus III is to empower
              (EMTs), paramedics, and firefighters (EMS/fire/rescue),   the public to provide emergency care. During inten-
              at the scene of the incident.                      tional mass-casualty events, those present at the point of
                                                                 wounding have often proven invaluable in responding
              The Joint Committee to Create a National Policy to   to the initial hemorrhage control needs of the wounded.
              Enhance Survivability from Intentional Mass-Casualty   Traditionally thought of as “bystanders,” these im-
              and Active Shooter Events was founded by the ACS.   mediate responders should not be considered passive
              The committee met twice in 2013, making specific rec-  observers and can provide effective lifesaving first-line
              ommendations and issuing a call to action. The delib-  treatment.
              erations of the committee have become known as the
              Hartford Consensus. A third meeting was convened on   Immediate responders contribute to a victim’s survival
              April 14. This Hartford Consensus III meeting focused   by performing critical external hemorrhage control
              on implementation strategies for effective hemorrhage   at the point of wounding and prior to the arrival of
              control.                                           traditional first responders.  Immediate responders
                                                                 contribute  to what  is  the critical  step  in eliminating
              The overarching principle of the Hartford Consensus   preventable prehospital death: the control of external
              is that in intentional mass-casualty and active shooter   hemorrhage.



              The Hartford Consensus                                                                         137
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154