Page 72 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2015

/executive-order-improving-access-mental-health-services- 57. Ghasemi A, et al. The difference in visual skills between expert
veterans-service. Accessed 1 May 2015. versus novice soccer referees. J Hum Kinet. 2009;22:15–20.
36. Guskiewicz KM, et al. Postural Stability and Neuropsycho- 58. Land MF, McLeod P. From eye movements to actions: how
logical Deficits After Concussion in Collegiate Athletes. J Athl batsmen hit the ball. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:1340–1345.
Train. 36, 263–273 (2001). 59. Mann DTY, et al. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a
37. Guskiewicz KM, Register-Mihalik JK. Postconcussive impair- meta-analysis. J Sport Exer Psychol. 2007;29:457–478.
ment differences across a multifaceted concussion assessment 60. Memmert D, et al. The relationship between visual attention
protocol. PM&R 2011;3:S445–S451. and expertise in sports. Psychol Sport Exer. 2009;10:146–151.
38. Guskiewicz KM, et al. Alternative approaches to the assess- 61. Savelsbergh GJP, et al. Visual search, anticipation and exper-
ment of mild head injury in athletes. Med Sci Sport Exer. tise in soccer goalkeepers. J Sport Sci. 2002;20:279–287.
1997;29:S213–S221. 62. Voss MW, et al. Are expert athletes ‘expert’ in the cognitive
39. King D, et al. Use of a rapid visual screening tool for the as- laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport ex-
sessment of concussion in amateur rugby league: a pilot study. pertise. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2009;24:812–826.
J Neurol Sci. 2012;320:16–21. 63. Zwierko T. Differences in peripheral perception between ath-
40. Lagos L, et al. A preliminary study: heart rate variability bio- letes and nonathletes. J Hum Kinet. 2007;19:53–62.
feedback for treatment of postconcussion syndrome. Biofeed- 64. Zwierko T, et al. Speed of visual sensorimotor processes and
back 213;41:136–143. conductivity of visual pathway in volleyball players. J Hum
41. Lovell M, et al. Management of cerebral concussion in mili- Kinet. 2010;23:21–27.
tary personnel: lessons learned from sports medicine. Oper 65. Alla S, et al. Defining asymptomatic status following sports
Techn Sport Med. 2005;13:212–221. concussion: fact or fallacy? Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:562–569.
42. Collins MW, et al. A comprehensive, targeted approach to the 66. Bahill AT, et al. Dynamic overshoot in saccadic eye move-
clinical care of athletes following sport-related concussion. ments is caused by neurological control signal reversals. Exp
Knee Sports Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:235–246. Neurol. 1975;48:107–122.
43. Covassin T, et al. Concussion history and postconcussion 67. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, et al. Eye movement control by the ce-
neurocognitive performance and symptoms in collegiate ath- rebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurol. 2004;17:17–25.
letes. J Athl Train. 2008;43:119–124. 68. Ventre-Dominey J, et al. Evidence for interacting cortical con-
44. Covassin T, et al. Effects of a maximal exercise test on neuro- trol of vestibular function and spatial representation in man.
cognitive function. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:370–374. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:1884–1898.
45. Hunt T, Asplund C. Concussion assessment and manage- 69. Handy TC, et al. Spatial distribution of visual attention: Per-
ment. Clin Sports Med. 2010;29:5–17. ceptual sensitivity and response latency. Percept Psychophys.
46. Galetta KM, et al. The King–Devick test and sports-related 1996;58:613–627.
concussion: study of a rapid visual screening tool in a col- 70. Wang L, et al. Mapping the structure of perceptual and visual-
legiate cohort. J Neurol Sci. 2011;309:34–39. motor abilities in healthy young adults. Acta Pyschol (Amst.).
47. Stewart GW, et al. Comprehensive assessment and manage- 2015;157:74–84.
ment of athletes with sport concussion. Int J Sport Phys Ther. 71. Erickson GB, et al. Reliability of a computer-based system
2012;7:433–447. for measuring visual performance skills. Optometry. 2011;
48. Hettich TE, et al. Case report: use of the Immediate post con- 82:528–542.
cussion assessment and cognitive testing (ImPACT) to assist 72. Harpham JA, et al. The effect of visual and sensory perfor-
with return to duty determination of special operations sol- mance on head impact biomechanics in college football play-
diers who sustained mild traumatic brain injury. J Spec Oper ers. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:1–10.
Med. 2010;10:48–55. 73. Appelbaum L, et al. Improved visual cognition through stro-
49. Helmick K, et al. Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center boscopic training. Front Psychol. 2011;2:1–13.
Working Group on the Acute Management of Mild Traumatic 74. Appelbaum L, et al. Stroboscopic visual training improves
Brain Injury in Military Operational Settings: clinical practice information encoding in short-term memory. Atten Percept
guideline and recommendations. 2006. http://www.pdhealth. Psychophys. 2012;74:1681–1691.
mil/downloads/clinical_practice_guideline_recommendations. 75. Coffey B, Reichow A. Optometric evaluation of the elite ath-
pdf. lete. Prob Optom. 1990;2:33–57.
50. Rabago CA, Wilken JM. Application of a mild traumatic 76. Smith TQ, Mitroff SR. Stroboscopic training enhances antici-
brain injury rehabilitation program in a virtual realty envi- patory timing. Int J Exerc Sci. 2012;5:344–353.
ronment: a case study. J Neurol Rehabil. 2011;35:185–193. 77. Zupan M, et al. Visual adaptations to sports vision enhance-
51. Radomski MV, et al. Development of a measure to inform ment training. Optometry Today. 2006;46:43–48.
return-to-duty decision making after mild traumatic brain in- 78. Erickson GB. Sports vision: vision care for the enhancement
jury. Mil Med. 2013;178:246–253. of sports performance. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann
52. Sayer NA, et al. Characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes Elsevier; 2007.
among patients with blast and other injuries sustained during 79. Hayes A, et al. Functional improvements following the use of
the global war on terror. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89: the NVT Vision Rehabilitation program for patients with hemi-
163–170. anopia following stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;31:19–30.
53. Abernathy B, Neal RJ. Visual characteristics of clay target 80. Leddy JJ, et al. Rehabilitation of concussion and post-
shooters. J Sci Med Sport. 1999;2:1–19. concussion syndrome. Sports Health, 2012;4:147–154.
54. Beckerman SA, Hitzeman S. The ocular and visual characteris- 81. Parker TM, et al. The effect of divided attention on gait sta-
tics of an athletic population. Optometry. 2001;72:498–509. bility following concussion. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:380–395.
55. Di Russo F, et al. Fixation stability and saccadic latency in 82. Parker TM, et al. Gait stability following concussion. Med Sci
elite shooters. Vis Res. 2003;43:1837–1845. Sport Exer. 2006;1032–1040 2006;38:1032–1040.
56. Gegenfurtner A, et al. Expertise differences in the comprehen- 83. Lichtenstein JD, et al. Age and test setting affect the preva-
sion of visualizations: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking research lence of invalid baseline scores on neurocognitive tests. Am J
in professional domains. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011;23:523–552. Sports Med. 2013;42:479–484.

62 Journal of Special Operations Medicine Volume 15, Edition 2/Summer 2015