Page 67 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2015
P. 67

1,2
              neurocognitive testing and clinical balance testing.  It is   postconcussion syndrome (PCS) compared with individu-
              still unknown if asymptomatic truly means healed and   ally matched non-PCS control subjects, showing that eye
              without  symptoms,  or  if  it  means  just  compensating.   movement function continued to be impaired postacutely
              There is also no reliable way to determine truthfulness   at more than 6 months. 23
              in reporting. For neurocognitive testing in military prac-
                                                                            30
              tice settings, it is difficult to interpret findings, as there   Brahm et al.  found the following visual dysfunctions
              are no normative data, and tests lack face validity for   in 68 military inpatients with TBI at a Veterans Affairs
              the conditions faced by military populations, especially   polytrauma rehabilitation center (PRC), and 124 military
              in deployed settings. Balance testing is incorporated into   outpatients with TBI at a polytrauma network site (PNS):
              postconcussive  evaluations either independently  or, as   subjective visual complaint (PRC 75.4%, PNS 75.8%);
              mentioned,  as  part  of  a  multimodal  assessment.  Bal-  convergence insufficiency (PRC 42.6%, PNS 48.4%); ac-
              ance deficits, as measured by the Balance Error Scoring   commodative insufficiency (PRC 39.6%, PNS 47.5%);
              System or force platform systems, have been observed   pursuit/saccadic dysfunction (PRC 30.2%, PNS 23.4%);
              for longer periods than appreciable cognitive test re-  fixation instability (PRC 9.5%, PNS 6.5%); strabismus
              sults. 4,8,12,26,36,38,52,65  In concussed athletes, evidence has   (PRC  25%,  PNS  7.3%);  and  reading  difficulties  (PRC
              suggested recovery time disparities among the three in-  65.5%, PNS 87.1%).
              dicators, thereby underscoring the importance of the
              multifaceted approach. Using this approach can aid cli-  Healthcare providers grossly assess eye movements non-
              nicians in understanding other comorbidities that may   quantitatively on physical examination (e.g., CN exami-
              complicate recovery and management of mTBI. 12,37  It   nation) in suspected cases of head injury. Contemporary
              also underscores the importance of continuing to search   research is demonstrating that these impairments are
              for more accurate and reliable screening and diagnostic   quantifiable at subclinical thresholds. Since 50% of the
              tools. Also of importance is determining disposition for   CNs relate in some way to vision, examination can di-
              those who are subacute or chronic and without resolu-  rectly assess not only function of the named nerves, but
              tion of symptoms. How to assess, follow up, and treat   brainstem function and the cortical regions through which
              those returned to duty who are still functional despite   these nerves and their associated white-matter tracts travel
              their continued symptoms is unclear.               en route to the muscles of the eyes. Such regions are nu-
                                                                 merous; have connections in nearly all functional areas
              Due to the complex, pervasive interconnections and inter-  of the brain, including those that support spatial process-
              actions between vision and cortical function, it is difficult   ing and span of attention; and are frequently damaged in
              to pinpoint from which areas visual deficits may arise and,   mTBI. 24,28,67  In the absence of preinjury deficits, postinjury
              conversely, how visual deficits impact  cognitive function   deficits in visual and oculomotor function, whether gross
              and rehabilitation. 23–25,28,29,66–70  It has long been suspected   or subtle, can be attributable with certainty to physical
              that, despite negative findings with traditional neuroimag-  damage to the structures affecting those functions.
              ing technology, diffuse axonal damage occurs with mTBI.
              A 2010 study found correlation between visual track-  New understanding of the importance of visual and vi-
              ing deficits and damage to white-matter tracts most as-  sually  mediated  performance  screening  and  what role
              sociated with oculomotor function in the brain, through   it might play in the rehabilitation of brain-injured pa-
              fractional anisotropy measurements with diffusion tensor   tients is emerging. Literature suggests that measures
              imaging–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The cor-  for assessing visual skills decrements are meaningful
              relations imply that gaze error variability during visual   and sensitive enough to be useful for baseline screening
                                                            24
              tracking may provide a useful screening tool for mTBI.    and aiding in determining progress and RTD decision-
              The primary sensory modality of vision includes color vi-  making. 23–25,27,28,71–73  Literature also suggests that there
              sion, visual field detection, and contrast sensitivity, which   are many useful training tools to improve visual, visual-
              are controlled by cranial nerve (CN) II, the common vi-  spatial, and visual-motor function in competitive athlete
              sual pathways, and visual centers of the occipital region.   populations. 73–77  A supplement to current guidelines for
              Near point of convergence, rapid saccade, dynamic visual   screening and treating mTBI subjects may be found in
              acuity, near–far accommodation, and smooth pursuit,   the examination of visual performance. 22–24,39,50,72,75,77–80
              which are all measures of coordinated oculomotor func-
              tion from CN III/IV/VI. Oculomotor dysfunction among   Of particular interest is the visual sensory evaluation
              the general population is commonly reported at between   and training station technology; there are Nike Visual
              20% to 30%, but as much as 90% of patients with TBI   Sensory Training Stations (STSs) (Nike Inc.; www.nike
              have been reported to suffer from it. 28,29        .com) residing in human performance facilities at several
                                                                 SOF locations.  25,42,93  It would make sense that research
              Heitger et al. found significant between-group differences   should occur at those locations, given the need for re-
              in oculomotor function between a group of patients with   search for this population. 70–72



              Postconcussion Visual Sensory Screening, Diagnostics, and Training for SOF                      57
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72