Page 75 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2015
P. 75

exercise, the soldiers had to complete and pass an ergo-  The participants were divided into two groups, Finish-
              metry stress test (with a minimum of 3W/kg of body   ers and Nonfinishers, and the data were tested for nor-
              weight), the Bundeswehr Standard Sport Tests, a psycho-  mal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For the
              logical assessment, and a 10-week special training pro-  data that were normally distributed, a t-test was con-
              gram. During the exercise, the soldiers had to cover a   ducted to compare the groups. For the data that were
              distance of approximately 160km over hilly terrain while   not normally distributed, comparison was made using
              carrying equipment weighing approximately 30kg. Indi-  the Mann-Whitney  U test (SPSS Statistics version 20
              viduals moved as a member of a small team, with each   software; IBM Deutschland GmbH; www.ibm.com/de
              team having to carry a crate of additional equipment   /de). In each case, the significance level was set at p ≤
              weighing approximately 25kg. The exercise was designed   .05. In addition, a purely descriptive comparison with
              as an orientation march, and the teams were tasked to   published data from extreme endurance exercises dur-
              find their own routes between checkpoints. For safety   ing civilian events was carried out.
              reasons, each team was accompanied by an instructor.
              The march was frequently interrupted so that special   Results
              tasks could be performed. These tasks, lasting about 30
              minutes, were executed at a maximum level of physical   Of the 51 participants, 22 completed the exercise
              exertion. Breaks of about 6 hours were taken in the af-  (43.1% Finishers). The blood levels of 46 soldiers were
              ternoon and, during this time, the soldiers had to set up   analyzed (90.2%). The serum collection tube of one sol-
              camp before they could sleep. In addition to the physical   dier did not contain enough blood for analysis and four
              exertion, the soldiers had to make do with a reduced food   other soldiers refused to have their blood taken. The
              supply and with drinking just water, but were allowed to   Nonfinishers endured physical exertion for an average
              drink as much as they wanted. In summary, the test was a   of 2.5 days, the Finishers for an average of 5 days.
              5-day endurance test involving marching with additional
              carried weights, sleep deprivation, a reduced food supply,   Hyponatremia
              and short periods of maximum exertion.             Mild hyponatremia was defined as a sodium level of
                                                                 135mmol/L or lower. Hyponatremia was considered
              Before starting the exercise, all participants’ body   severe for sodium levels of 130mmol/L or lower and
              weights were measured and the participants were exam-  critical for sodium levels of 120mmol/L or lower.  Three
                                                                                                          8
              ined by a physician to identify any medical conditions   soldiers  (5.9%)  were  diagnosed with  mild hyponatre-
              disqualifying their participation. During the course of   mia (two Finishers (134mmol/L and 135mmol/L) and
              the exercise, the Nonfinishers had their blood and tem-  one Nonfinisher (133.2mmol/L). No cases of severe or
              perature taken (tympanic measurement using a Braun   even critical hyponatremia were detected. There was no
              ThermoScan ;  Braun  GmbH; www.brauntherms.com)    significant difference in the sodium concentration be-
                        ®
              in a warm environment immediately after dropping   tween the Finishers (mean ± standard deviation [SD]:
              out, while the Finishers had their blood and tempera-  138.3mmol/L ± 2.1mmol/L) and the Nonfinishers (mean
              ture taken at the finish. Within 4 hours, the blood was   ± SD: 139.4mmol/L ± 2.1mmol/L).
              delivered to the laboratory of a local civilian hospital
              for processing. The following blood levels were evalu-  Muscle Damage
              ated statistically: sodium,  gamma-glutamyltransferase   Both groups showed a marked increase in both AST and
              (GGT), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate trans-  ALT compared to normal reference levels, with the Fin-
              aminase (AST), creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein   ishers showing the highest levels. In contrast, none of
              (CRP), and leukocytes.  Other data recorded were  the   the participants showed an increase in GGT above the
              soldiers’ current medical conditions, any injuries they   normal level. A marked increase in CK was found in
              sustained during the exercise, and their body weights,   both groups without significant difference between the
              which were measured using the same scales during the   groups (Table 1). A CK level of 5,000U/L is evidence
              pre-exercise intake.                               of serious muscle damage ; six of the Finishers and two
                                                                                       9

              Table 1  Markers of Muscle Damage
                                   AST,  U/L            ALT,  U/L            GGT,  U/L            CK,  U/L
                                      *,†
                                                                                 *
                                                                                                      *
                                                           *,†
                                 (ref.: 0–50 U/L)    (ref.: 10–50 U/L)    (ref.: 10–60 U/L)     (ref.: <190 U/L)
              Finishers           149 (44/349)         107 (50/215)           18 (3/37)         3,330 (76/7,850)
              Nonfinishers         96 (33/542)          47 (22/292)         18.5 (10/36)       3,020 (348/12,400)
              Notes: ALT, alanine aminotransaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransaminase; CK, creatine kinase; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; ref., reference.
              *Data given as median (minimum/maximum).
              † Significant difference between Finishers and Nonfinishers (p ≤ .05).


              Medical Conditions in German SOF Selection                                                      65
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80