Page 63 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2015
P. 63

Table 5  Change in Average Power (%)               The patient had an initial bilateral Biodex test performed;
                     Extension   Flexion   Extension   Flexion   however, the ability to compare strength to the contralat­
               Case   Speed 1   Speed 1    Speed 2   Speed 2     eral limb was limited because of trauma  sustained to his
                1      14.2       70.1      –11.9      47.4      lower left extremity 2 years earlier. He had a 43% deficit
                                                                 in peak torque (Table 1), 56% deficit in average power
                2      42.2       19        33.5       90.9      (Table 2), and 58% deficit in total work (Table 3), all with
                3       7.6       26.2      44.5       29.4      knee extension at 90º/sec. He demonstrated deficiency
                4      12.8       24.8      29.2       47.1      at 300º/sec only in total work (Table 3). After 2 weeks
                5      33.2       35        29.4       18.3      of training on the right lower extremity, the patient’s im­
                                                                 provements were greatest in extension at 90º/sec with
                6      76.4      102.5      108.4     212.1      peak torque increasing 63% (Table 4), average power 8%
                7      75.3       63.6      79.7       86.1      (Table 5), and total work 77% (Table 6, Figure 1).
              Notes: All measurements are affected extremity comparing power (W)
              after 2 weeks of BFR training to baseline measurement before BFR   Figure 1  Average percent total work difference of the
              training started, expressed as percentage. Speed 1 is 90º/sec. Speed 2   affected to the nonaffected extremity. Speed 1 is 90º/sec.
              is 300º/sec.                                       Speed 2 is 300º/sec.
              Table 6  Change in Total Work (%)
                     Extension   Flexion   Extension   Flexion
               Case   Speed 1   Speed 1    Speed 2   Speed 2
                1       7         69.6      –13.6      49.5
                2      27.3       3.9       22.8      ­20.1
                3      77.6       17.1      34.9       26.3
                4      26.1       6.4       54.1       20.8
                5      24.8       25.2      26.9       17.9
                6      40.8       64.8      77.3      159.4
                7      62.7       61.9      63.4       78.7
              Notes: All measurements are affected extremity comparing work (J)
              after 2 weeks of BFR training to baseline measurement before BFR   Case Presentation 4
              training started, expressed as percentage. Speed 1 is 90º/sec. Speed 2
              is 300º/sec.                                       The patient is a 26­year­old man who in 2009 sustained
                                                                 a gunshot wound to the right femur. He underwent
              total knee replacement surgery; however, he first needed   open reduction and internal fixation, but subsequently
              to increase his quadriceps strength and function. He was   developed osteomyelitis. After a prolonged course of
              referred for BFR training 4 years after his last surgery.
                                                                 treatment—including removal of all hardware, multiple
                                                                 debridements, and both local and systemic antibiotics—
              Initial Biodex testing demonstrated a more significant def­  his fracture healed following revision fixation in 2011.
              icit in knee extension, with a 52% deficit in peak torque   To treat an acquired quadriceps contracture, he had a
              (Table 1), 61% deficit in average power (Table 2), and   soft­tissue  release  approximately 1 year  later. He  was
              57% deficit in knee extension total work in the left lower   referred for BFR training 1 year after his last surgery.
              extremity compared with the contralateral side (Table 3),
              with the largest deficits shown in extension at 90º/sec.   His knee extension weakness was substantial, with a def­
              After 2 weeks of BFR therapy, he had a 42% increase in   icit in peak torque of 67% and 54% compared with the
              power (Table 5) and a 27% increase in both peak torque   contralateral limb at 90º/sec and 300º/sec, respectively
              (Table 4) and total work (Table 6) at 90º/sec.
                                                                 (Table 1). Average power showed 76% and 73% defi­
                                                                 cits in knee extension (Table 2), and total work showed
              Case Presentation 3                                74% and 73% deficits in knee extension (Table 3). After
                                                                 2 weeks of BFR training, his peak torque improved 13%
              The patient is a 24­year­old man who sustained major   and 36% (Table 4), average power improved 13% and
              left lower extremity trauma in 2011 resulting in tibia   29% (Table 5), and total work improved 26% and 54%
              plafond,  fibula, and  calcaneus  fractures.  He subse­  at 90º/sec and 300º/sec, respectively (Table 6).
              quently underwent multiple surgical interventions for
              management of his injuries and most recently had a   Case Presentation 5
              right knee arthroscopy to include microfracture. He was
              referred for BFR training for his right lower extremity 6   The patient is a 29­year­old man who in 2010 sustained
              months after his most recent surgery.              left open tibia and fibula fractures from an improvised



              Blood Flow Restriction Rehabilitation for Extremity Weakness                                    53
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68