Page 107 - JSOM Spring 2026

extension of combat blast–mTBI paradigms. He highlighted Conclusion
emerging evidence on genomic and imaging responses, sug-
gested the importance of quantifying exposure dose, and em- Mike Hetzler, as symposium moderator, closed by tying con-
phasized the operational need to standardize sampling and tent, community, and capability development into a narrative
mitigation behaviors while biomarkers and long-term out- of measurable growth for the symposium in its third year,
comes remain under investigation. A key take-home was that highlighting increased participation and the value of inclusive
appearing fine does not equate to being unaffected—an un- safe space engagement. He underscored the strategic relevance
comfortable but essential message for SOF communities that of Ukrainian testimony and pointed toward future focus ar-
rely on performance under cumulative stress. eas requested by the community, such as environmental and
physiology challenges, unmanned aerial vehicles/drones, and
AI-enabled training and decision support. He also reaffirmed
Governance, Data, and the Ethics of the Hard Cases
COL Jennifer Gurney, Chief of the Joint Trauma System (JTS), that relationships and mentorship remain the symposium’s
argued that data is a force multiplier—documentation at the most durable outputs.
point of injury enables a battlefield learning system that con-
verts lessons into TCCC clinical practice guidelines, training The ISTC Commander’s final remarks, viewed through a med-
standards, and materiel solutions. She framed JTS through the ical lens, distilled the symposium into three healthcare-relevant
four rights (i.e., patient, place, time, and care); showed how imperatives: preserve frank clinical debate as a mechanism to
earlier conflicts lacked integration despite the presence of med- produce teachable solutions; treat Ukraine-derived LSCO les-
ics, helicopters, and surgeons; and reinforced that governance sons as context-dependent signals that must be translated into
and registries are what make improvement durable. Her LSCO portable principles, not copied tactics; and close the loop from
warnings were direct: minutes matter for hemorrhage survival, lessons observed to validated tactics, techniques, and proce-
evacuation will be degraded, and the burden will shift toward dures (TTPs), curricula, and standards shared back to the mul-
Role 1 providers. She also cautioned against rigid expectant tinational community and SOFCOM. In other words, keep the
casualty care algorithms, emphasizing re-triage, pain control, humility to learn, the discipline to standardize what matters,
and the moral injury risk of premature futility labeling. She and the urgency to train for the fight that will not grant us the
closed with JTS modernization efforts to accelerate feedback conditions we became comfortable with.
loops.
The next ISTC Medical Symposium is scheduled for 22–25
September 2026. Save the date and stay tuned via the official
The palliative care session conducted by CPT Oronzo Chiala
and LCL Jennifer Pregler addressed a topic many communities Signal chat group (QR code shown in Figure 1).
avoid until they are forced into it. The consensus was not about
giving up, but about acknowledging that resource constraints,
prolonged timelines, and mass casualty pressure will make
care of dying patients unavoidable. The constructive path for- FIGURE 1 ISTC Medical Symposium
ward is clear: shared terminology, practical frameworks (not QR code of the official chat group.
rigid algorithms), symptom control toolkits suitable for aus-
tere settings, meticulous documentation, telemedicine reach-
back, and training that includes difficult conversations and
team support, because moral injury is not prevented by silence.
OF-4 Pregler reinforced ethical and legal clarity, then offered Acknowledgments
symptom-management frameworks suitable for austere con- The authors sincerely thank all speakers and participants of
ditions while advocating shared terminology and adaptable the ISTC Medical Symposium 2025 for their valuable contri-
standards that account for cultural and legal variation. butions and engaging discussions. Their expertise and collab-
oration have greatly enriched the event, advancing innovation
in Special Operations medical care.
A Symposium Outcome That Matters:
Tourniquet Conversion Consensus
Finally, the consensus discussion on tourniquet conversion, Author Contributions
moderated by COL (Ret) Stacy Shackelford and shaped by OC, JP, AP, SAS, JRG, JK, MRH, and MAB participated in
Ukraine lessons, captured the symposium at its best: a room event planning and conduction. OC drafted the manuscript,
of experts and operators debating bluntly, then simplifying to- JP, AP, SAS, JG, JK, MRH, MT, JRG, SS and MAB revised it.
ward a usable solution. The core themes were KISS (“Keep it
simple and . . . straightforward”); role-appropriate language Disclosures
(non-medical vs. medic/clinician); controlled reassessment and The authors have nothing to disclose.
removal with immediate re-tightening if re-bleeding occurs;
and the recognition that overly complex checklists increase Funding
errors under pressure, whereas simple drills perform reliably. No funding was received for this work.
Most importantly, the group framed reassessment and removal
of tourniquets as a battle drill, trained to automaticity, nested PMID: 41818141;
in tactical reality, and designed to reduce human error. DOI: 10.55460/J.Spec.Oper.Med.2026.1GZ4-0P29

ISTC Medical Symposium | 105