Page 91 - JSOM Summer 2025

WwK-lFzmAhAC&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=on+the+presence 11. Sheets-Johnstone M. The Phenomenology of Dance. Arno Press;
+of+the+body&ots=35achQ5iof&sig=L5WcW_X3GhUddngr 1980.
EXQavBkcrtw 12. Gapenne O. Kinesthesia and the construction of perceptual ob-
2. Jeschke EA, Baker JB, Wyma-Bradley J, Dorsch J, Huffman SL. jects. In: Stewart J, Gapenne O, Di Paolo ES, eds. Enaction: To-
Conventional resilience and the impact of catastrophic injury ex- ward a new paradigm for cognitive science. The MIT Press; 2010.
posure on special operations surgical teams. J Spec Oper Med. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.001.0001
2023;23(2):102–106. doi:10.55460/FHIP-DWHB 13. Sheets-Johnstone M. The ineluctable modality of movement: its
3. Ockelford A. Zygonic theory: introduction, scope, and prospects. everyday and aesthetic presence. The Journal of Speculative Phi-
Zeitschrift Der Gesellschaft Für Musiktheorie. 2009;6(1):91–172. losophy. 2022;36(1):1–33.
4. Judge J. ‘Feeling the beat’: multimodal perception and the expe- 14. Huschka S, Gronau B, eds. Energy and Forces as Aesthetic Inter-
rience of musical movement. In: Cheyne P, Hamilton A, Paddison ventions: Politics of Bodily Scenarios. transcript publishing; 2019.
M, eds. The Philosophy of Rhythm: Aesthetics, Music, Poetics. 15. Johnson MR. Aristotle on Teleology. Clarendon Press; 2005. Ac-
Oxford University Press; 2019:76. cessed August 8, 2024. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr
5. Large EW, Roman I, Kim JC, et al. Dynamic models for musical =&id=3BFREAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=aristotle+
rhythm perception and coordination. Front Comput Neurosci. four+causes+teleology&ots=I2RiWyj-Vp&sig=1-EEykqJCP
2023;17:1151895. doi:10.3389/fncom.2023.1151895 dzmymY9r0T0v5-gMw
6. Losee J. A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. 16. Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing
4th Ed. Oxford University Press; 2001. Flow in Work and Play, 25th Anniversary Edition. Jossey-Bass;
7. Quinlan M. Training neoliberal dancers. In: Huschka S and Gro- 2000.
nau B, eds. Energy and Forces as Aesthetic Interventions: Politics 17. Bartenieff I, Lewis D. Body Movement: Coping with the Envi-
of Bodily Scenarios. transcript publishing; 2019:137–154. ronment. Routledge; 2013. Accessed August 8, 2024. https://
8. Jeschke EA, Baker JB, Wyma-Bradley J, Dorsch J, Huffman SL. www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315025445/
Unconventional resilience: a strategic framework. J Spec Oper body-movement-irmgard-bartenieff-dori-lewis
Med. 2023;23(3):58–62. doi:10.55460/2W3U-2XHB 18. Huschka S. Aesthetic scenarios of energeia: bodies as transforma-
9. Kosman LA. Aristotle’s definition of motion. Phronesis. 1969;14 tional fields of force. In: Huschka S, Gronau B, eds. Energy and
(1):40–62. Forces as Aesthetic Interventions: Politics of Bodily Scenarios.
10. Sheets-Johnstone M. Thinking in movement: further analyses and transcript publishing; 2019. doi:10.14361/9783839447031-004
validations. In: Stewart J, Gapenne O, Di Paolo ES, eds. Enaction: 19. Juntunen ML, Hyvönen L. Embodiment in musical knowing: how
Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. The MIT Press; body movement facilitates learning within Dalcroze Eurhythmics.
2010. doi:10.7551/mitpress/8629.003.0007 British Journal of Music Education. 2004;21(2):199–214.
PMID: 40294098; DOI: 10.55460/Q4T9-JT45

Unconventional Resilience: Integrated Performance Infrastructure | 89