Page 52 - JSOM Spring 2025
P. 52

Man, Hibernating Animals, and Poikilothermic Fish

                                   The Present and Future of BCI Technology



                                                 Anna M. Gielas, PhD








          ABSTRACT
          In 2024 and early 2025, several successful surgeries involving   In the last decade, the concept of the cyborg has gained re-
          brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) gained media attention, in-  newed attention, with some national security experts anticipat-
          cluding those conducted by Elon Musk’s company Neuralink,   ing the use of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to cognitively
                                                                                                   2–5
          which implanted BCIs in three paralyzed volunteers, allowing   and physically enhance armed forces personnel.  BCIs cre-
          them to control computers through thought alone. While the   ate a direct pathway between the human brain and external
          concept of merging humans with machines dates back to the   devices enabling, for instance, a person with tetraplegia to
                                                                                                     6
          1960s, BCI technology has now entered the clinical trial stage,   control their wheelchair using only their thoughts.  Similarly,
          with a focus on restoring communication, mobility, and sen-  BCIs have allowed healthy individuals to pilot drones through
                                                                    7
          sation in individuals with severe disabilities and neurodegen-  thought.  If a BCI is implanted in the brain and enhances the
          erative disorders. For over two decades, BCIs have also been   individual with abilities like mentally controlling drones, the
          explored as tools to enhance the cognitive and physical abili-  person can be considered a cyborg.  However, it is important
                                                                                         5
          ties of military personnel. However, before Special Operations   to note that the term is a conceptual label rather than a formal
          Forces (SOF) medical staff encounter BCIs in an enhancement   scientific classification.
          capacity, they are likely to first come across them in medical
          settings. This article provides an overview of BCI technology,   The  Defense  Advanced  Research  Projects  Agency  (DARPA)
          focusing on 1) how it works, 2) its potential significance for   has been a key supporter of BCI research since the early 2000s,
          injured SOF servicemembers, 3) current challenges, and 4) its   while the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) and
          potential to enhance SOF in the future.            Army Research Laboratory have expressed interest in BCIs
                                                             since the 2010s. 8–12  Depending on the source, the arrival of en-
          Keywords: brain computer interface; neurotechnologies;   hancive BCI technology is expected between 2028 and 2035,
          translational research; spinal cord injuries; prosthetics;   with predictions suggesting that Special Operations Forces
          traumatic brain injury; neuroenhancement           (SOF) will be among the first military populations to adopt
                                                             it. 13–16  However, before SOF medical personnel encounter this
                                                             technology as part of their national security duties and oper-
                                                             ations, they may first come across the technology in medical
          Introduction
                                                             settings since BCI applications are increasingly tested in trans-
          In 1960, two U.S. scientists reflected on the ability of man,   lational projects and clinical trials. This in brief article aims
          hibernating animals, and poikilothermic fish to regulate body   to introduce BCI technology, focusing on 1) its mechanisms,
          temperature.  While hibernating animals and poikilothermic   2) its relevance to injured SOF servicemembers, 3) its current
          fish solve the basic yet crucial challenge of extreme tempera-  challenges, and 4) its anticipated neuroenhancing applications
          tures through innate homeostatic mechanisms, humans rely   for SOF personnel.
          on external technologies such as heating and air condition-
          ing. Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline sought to change   The Operational Framework of BCIs
          this.  They envisioned a human enhanced by biotechnology,
          capable of surviving in the harshest environments, including   A BCI system typically consists of three components: a sensor,
          outer space. As the space race between the U.S. and the Soviet   a decoder, and an external device (effector) like a wheelchair
          Union intensified, Clynes and Kline introduced the concept of   or a drone. 17,18  Connection is established through wireless
          a human-machine hybrid, coining the term “cyborg,” short for   technologies such as Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, or tethered connec-
                                                                 19
          cybernetic organism. Contrary to popular belief, the cyborg   tions.  The sensor records neural signals, while the decoder
          is not a creation of Hollywood or a character from a science   processes  the  raw signal  input,  extracting  so-called  features
          fiction bestseller. Instead, the cybernetic organism originated   and translating them into commands for the effector. 18,20,21  In
          from a conference paper that Clynes and Kline presented at the   theory, an effector can be any device that is programmable to
          Space Flight Symposium in San Antonio in May 1960. 1  receive and execute commands.  For example, in August 2024,
                                                                                     20
          Correspondence to Anna M. Gielas, 81 Stock Street, Flat 0/1 Paisley, PA2 6NQ United Kingdom or amg203@cantab.ac.uk
          Dr. Anna M. Gielas is affiliated with the Centre for Global Knowledge Studies, University of Cambridge (UK).

                                                           50
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57