Page 51 - JSOM Spring 2025
P. 51

18.  Goyes DR, Sandberg S. Trust, nuance, and care: advantages and chal-  38.  Johnson JL, Adkins D, Chauvin S. A review of the quality indica-
                 lenges of repeat qualitative interviews. Qualitative Research. Pub-  tors of rigor in qualitative research. Am J Pharm Edu. 2020;84(1):
                 lished online April 12, 2024. doi:10.1177/14687941241246159  7120. doi:10.5688/ajpe7120
              19.  Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design:
                 Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage; 2018.     TABLE A1  Participant Demographics
              20.  Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative
                 research: exploring its conceptualization and operationaliza-               No. of Participants and
                 tion. Quality & Quantity. 2017;52(4):1893–1907. doi:10.1007/  Category      Expanding Information
                 s11135-017-0574-8                               Branch of Service
              21.  Rahimi S, Khatooni M. Saturation in qualitative research: an evo-  Navy          4
                 lutionary concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024;6:100174.
                 doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100174                 Army                               4
              22.  Alhazmi AA, Kaufmann A. Phenomenological qualitative meth-  Enlisted Rank
                 ods applied to the analysis of cross-cultural experience in novel   E8             1
                 educational social contexts. Front Psychol. 2022;13:785134. doi:   E7              1
                 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134
              23.  Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member check-  E6               6
                 ing: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to val-  Specialty/NEC/MOS  091A, L03A/804G, L02A,
                 idation? Qualitative Health Research. 2016;26(13):1802–1811.                  68W W1, 68W30
                 doi:10.1177/1049732316654870                    Conventional Military              3
              24.  Jamieson MK, Govaart GH, Pownall M. Reflexivity in quanti-  Special Operations   5
                 tative research: a rationale and beginner’s guide. Social and Per-
                 sonality Psychology Compass. 2023;17(4):e12735. doi:10.1111/
                 spc3.12735                                      PMID: 40085829; DOI: 10.55460/UH66-Y9QW
              25.  Simon M, Danner S, Saavedra S, et al. The complex interplay
                 of  communication  and  trust  in  healthcare  delivery.  Harv  Pub-
                 lic Health Rev (Camb). 2021;39:10.54111/0001/mm5. doi:10.
                 54111/0001/mm5
              26.  National  Academies  of  Sciences,  Engineering,  and  Medicine;
                 Policy and Global  Affairs; Board on Higher Education and
                 Workforce; Committee on Effective Mentoring in STEMM. The
                 Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. National Academies
                 Press (US); 2019 Oct 30. Accessed August 26, 2024. https://www.
                 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK552775/
              27.  Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Inter-
                 personal and Communication Skills. In: Common Program Re-
                 quirements. Section IV, Subsection A, Number 5d. 2008. Accessed
                 August 26, 2024. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/bulletin/bulletin
                 12_05.pdf
              28.  Jones M, Fear NT, Greenberg N, et al. Do medical services person-
                 nel who deployed to the Iraq war have worse mental health than
                 other deployed personnel? Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(4):422–
                 427. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckn031
              29.  Kim S, Yang EB. Does group cohesion foster self-directed learn-
                 ing for medical students? A longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ.
                 2020;20:55. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-1962-7
              30.  Nova Southeastern University.  Group Cohesion Scale. Ac-
                 cessed August 26, 2024. https://www.nova.edu/gsc/forms/Group
                 CohesionScale.pdf
              31.  Cole R, Crawford K, Farrell M, Vojta L, Schwartz J, Rudinsky
                 SL.  The relationship between the military medical officer and
                 commanding officer: implications for education and training. Mil
                 Med. 2024;usae337. doi:10.1093/milmed/usae337
              32.  Cole R, Shumaker JT, Melo E, et al. Operation Bushmaster’s im-
                 pact on military medical student deployment readiness. Mil Med.
                 2023;188(Supplement_2):56–62. doi:10.1093/milmed/usad011
              33.  Cole R, Garrigan AG, Peters SA, et al. The impact of Operation
                 Bushmaster on medical student decision-making in a high-stress,
                 operational environment.  Mil Med. 2023;188(Supplement_3):
                 28–33. doi:10.1093/milmed/usac373
              34.  Cole R, Wagner R, Egan SJ, Van Shufflin M, Tilley L. Military
                 medical student experiences during a prolonged casualty care
                 simulation. Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health. 2023;31(4).
                 doi:10.2023-98438352/JMVH Vol 31 No 4
              35.  Picano JJ, Roland RR, Williams TJ, Bartone PT. Assessment of
                 Elite Operational Personnel. In: Bowles S, Bartone PT, eds. Hand-
                 book of Military Psychology. Springer; 2017.
              36.  Wagner R, Cole R,  Thompson J, Egan SJ,  VanShufflin MW,
                 Tilley L. The impact of special operations medics and corpsmen
                 on military medical student training: a qualitative study. J Spec
                 Oper Med. 2023;23(2):78–81. doi:10.55460/rsa6-6fa7
              37.  Cole R, Rudinsky S, Conley SP, et al. The impact of medical school
                 on military physicians’ readiness for their first deployment. Mil
                 Med. 2022;187(7–8):e995–e1006. doi:10.1093/milmed/usac049

                                                                           Interprofessional Dynamics in Military Medicine  |  49
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56