Page 41 - JSOM Summer 2023

This study had several limitations, primarily that volunteers References
were more familiar with the CAT than the MTET, given their 1. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield
positions as experienced medics and combat medic instructors (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care.
routinely using the CAT for instruction. Furthermore, we could J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437.
not completely blind participants from seeing which device 2. Montgomery HR, Hammesfahr R, Fisher AD, et al. 2019 recom-
mended limb tourniquets in tactical combat casualty care. J Spec
they were given at the time of application. These facts may have Oper Med. 2019;19(4):27–50.
had an effect on time measurements. However, in comparison 3. Fisher AD, Washbum G, Powell D, et al. Damage control resus-
with numerous other studies comparing tourniquets, given citation in prolonged field care. J Spec Oper Med. 2018;18(3):
the identical appearance and mechanisms of the MTET, these 109–119.
facts are likely to have had minimal effect on the outcomes of 4. Drew B, Montgomery HR, Butler FK Jr. Tactical combat casu-
this study. All tourniquets were stored in watertight containers alty care (TCCC) guidelines for medical personnel: 05 November
2020. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(4):144–151.
prior to use, were used within 1 month of receiving them from 5. Gibson R, Housler GJ, Rush SC, Aden JK 3rd, Kragh JF Jr, Du-
suppliers, and were used only once, in accordance with manu- bick MA. Preliminary comparison of new and established tactical
facture and military recommendations. These ideal conditions tourniquets in a manikin hemorrhage model. J Spec Oper Med.
may differ from those on the battlefield or when a tourniquet 2016;16(1):29–35.
is attempted to be reused. Finally, all testing was performed in 6. Carius BM, Tapia AD, Uhaa N, et al. STAT vs. CAT: a pilot com-
a controlled classroom-style setting and thus did not perfectly parison after a video demonstration. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;47:
305–306.
duplicate the stressful nature of battlefield medicine. 7. Beaven A, Ballard M, Sellon E, Briard R, Parker PJ. The Combat
Application Tourniquet versus the Tactical Mechanical Tourni-
quet. J Spec Oper Med. 2018;18(3):75–78.
Conclusion 8. Walters TJ, Wenke JC, Kauvar DS, McManus JG, Holcomb JB,
Tested and proven emergency-use limb tourniquets are being Baer DG. Effectiveness of self-applied tourniquets in human vol-
imitated and sold by little-known companies across mass mar- unteers. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9(4):416–422.
kets for a fraction of the cost of CoTCCC-recommended de- 9. Kragh JF Jr, Walters TJ, Westmoreland T, et al. Tragedy into
drama: an american history of tourniquet use in the current war.
vices, leading to the presence of rarely tested tourniquets made J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13(3):5–25.
of potentially inadequate materials. Our findings demonstrate 10. The Counterfeit Report. Counterfeit Product Alert: how to identify
that copycat tourniquets cannot be assumed to be equivalent counterfeit C-A-T Combat Application Tourniquets (CAT). Ac-
in quality or functionality to robustly tested tourniquets. cessed 23 March 2022. https://thecounterfeitreport.com/product
/595/Combat-Application-Tourniquets-%28CAT%29.html.
11. Shertz M. School district issues counterfeit tourniquets during
Disclaimer National Stop the Bleed Month. Crisis Medicine. Accessed 23
The view(s) expressed herein are those of the author(s) and March 2022. https://www.crisis-medicine.com/school-district-
do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army issues-counterfeit-tourniquets/.
Medical Center, Madigan Army Medical Center, the US Army 12. Shertz M. Recon medical “tourniquets”—speculation over science.
Medical Department, the US Army Office of the Surgeon Gen- Crisis Medicine. Accessed 24 March 2022. https://www.crisis-
eral, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air medicine.com/recon-medical-tourniquets-speculation-over-
Force, or the Department of Defense or the US Government. science/.
13. Smith BG. SZCTKLINK trademark details. Justia Trademarks.
Accessed 24 March 2022. https://trademarks.justia.com/872/36/
Acknowledgments szctklink-87236668.html.
None. 14. Kragh JF Jr, O‘Neill ML, Walters TJ, et al. Minor morbidity with
emergency tourniquet use to stop bleeding in severe limb trauma:
Ethics research, history, and reconciling advocates and abolitionists. Mil
The Brooke Army Medical Center institutional review board Med. 2011;176(7):817–823.
reviewed and approved protocol C.2021.061. 15. Graham B, Breault MJ, McEwen JA, McGraw RW. Occlusion of
arterial flow in the extremities at subsystolic pressures through
the use of wide tourniquet cuffs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;
Financial Disclosure Jan(286):257–261.
We have no relevant disclosures to report. 16. Composite Res. Inc. v. Recon Med. LLC. Case No. 2:17-cv-01755-
MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Jul. 5, 2019). Accessed 24 March 2022.
Funding https://casetext.com/case/composite-res-inc-v-recon-med-llc-4.
We received no funding for this study. 17. Davinson JP, Kragh JF Jr, Aden JK 3rd, DeLorenzo RA, Dubick
MA. Laboratory testing of emergency tourniquets exposed to
prolonged heat. J Spec Oper Med. 2015;15(1):34–38.
Author Contributions
DKS and BMC conceived the study concept. DKS organized PMID: 37094290; DOI: 10.55460/4SEI-O7LO
and observed volunteer participation and data collection. DKS
and BMC analyzed the data. DKS and BMC wrote the first
draft and read, provided critical revisions to, and approved the
final manuscript.

Arterial Occlusion: MTET versus CAT | 39