Page 17 - JSOM Fall 2020
P. 17

environmental descriptors, provider training, modes of trans-  used  this  agent  frequently.  Also  fielded  was  25%  albumin,
              portation,  injuries,  mechanism  of  injury,  vital  signs,  treat-  an agent that lacks coagulation factors but offers impressive
              ments, equipment and resources used, duration of PFC, and   volume expansion with minimal weight to carry and requires
              morbidity and mortality status on delivery to the next level   no reconstitution in the field. The current potential value of
              of care. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey   25% albumin is largely overlooked. Although FDP presents
              responses.  Results:  Surveys from 54 patients treated during   an attractive future option for battlefield prehospital fluid re-
              41 missions were analyzed. The PFC provider was on scene   suscitation once FDA approved, this article argues that in the
              at time of injury or illness for 40.7% (22/54) of cases. The   interim, 25% albumin, augmented with fibrinogen concen-
              environment was described as remote or austere for 96.3%   trate and tranexamic acid to mitigate hemodilution effects on
              (52/54) of cases. Enemy activity or weather also contributed   coagulation capacity, offers an effective volume resuscitation
              to need for PFC in 37.0% (20/54) of cases. Care was provided   alternative that could save lives on the battlefield immediately.
              primarily outdoors (37.0%; 20/54) and in hardened nonmed-
              ical structures (37.0%; 20/54) with 42.6% (23/54) of cases   2017;17(4):115–126
              managed in two or more locations or transport platforms.   Evaluation and Treatment of Ocular Injuries and   Vision-
              Teleconsultation was obtained in 14.8% (8/54) of cases. The   Threatening Conditions in Prolonged Field Care  Mark Reyn-
              prehospital time of care ranged from 4 to 120 hours (median   olds, MD, MPH; Carl Hoover, 18D; Jamie Riesberg, MD;
              10 hours), and five (9.3%) patients died prior to transport to   Robert Mazzoli, MD; Marcus Colyer, MD; Scott Barnes, MD;
              next level of care. Conclusion: PFC in the prehospital setting is   Christopher Calvano, MD; James Karesh, MD; Clinton Mur-
              a vital area of military medicine about which data are sparse.   ray, MD; Frank K. Butler Jr, MD; Sean Keenan, MD; Stacy
              This review was a novel initial analysis of recent US military   Shackelford, MD
              PFC experiences, with descriptive findings that should prove
              helpful for future efforts to include defining unique skillsets   EXCERPT: Evaluation and treatment of ocular injuries and
              and capabilities needed to effectively respond to a variety of     vision-threatening conditions in a prolonged field care (PFC)
              PFC contingencies.                                 situation can be extremely challenging. These events can lead
                                                                 to irreversible loss of vision with lasting effects on military
              2017;17(2):74–81                                   service and overall quality of life. The goal of this clinical prac-
              The Sole Provider: Preparation for Deployment to a Medically   tice guideline (CPG) is to provide medical professionals with
                                                                 essential information on the recognition and treatment of ocu-
              Austere Theater  Paul Corso, 18D, DMT, NREMT-P; Cristo-  lar conditions when evacuation to an eye specialist is delayed.
              bal Mandry, MD; Steven Reynolds, 18D, DMT
                                                                 The guidelines are based on standard ophthalmic practice
              ABSTRACT: The combat focus of the US Military over the   adapted to address the austere or remote environment, when
              past 15 years has primarily centered on the Iraq and Afghan-  the “Shield and Ship” guidelines are interrupted by delayed
              istan areas of operation (AOs). Thus, much human and fi-  evacuation.
              nancial capital has been dedicated to the creation of a robust   As with all medical concerns, recognition of the problem is
              medical infrastructure to support those operations. However,   the first step. This is a particular challenge for ocular condi-
              Special Operation Forces (SOF) are often called upon to de-  tions. Comprehensive ocular evaluation is not usually possible
              ploy in much more medically austere AOs. SOF medical   in austere locations and training in rapid recognition of ocu-
              providers operating in such environments face significant chal-  lar conditions may be limited. The ocular conditions covered
              lenges due to the diversity of medical threats, extremely lim-  in this guideline are the most common traumatic injuries and
              ited access to medical resupply, a material shortage of casualty   vision-threatening conditions that require rapid identification
              evacuation platforms, lack of medical facilities, and limited   and treatment to prevent loss of vision. A more comprehensive
              access to higher-level care providers. This article highlights the
              challenges faced during a recent Special Forces deployment to   review can be found in the Joint Trauma System CPG or Wil-
                                                                 derness Medicine textbook.
              such an austere environment. Many of these challenges can be
              mitigated with a specific approach to premission training and
              preparation.                                       2018;18(1):29–31
                                                                 Case Report: The Shrail: A Comparison of a Novel Attachable
              2017;17(2):82–88                                   Rail System With the Current Deployment Operating Table
              Albumin for Prehospital Fluid Resuscitation of Hemorrhagic   Joshua Dilday, DO; Maxwell Sirkin, MD; Thomas Wertin,
              Shock in Tactical Combat Casualty Care  Nicholas M. Studer,   MD; Frances Bradley, CRNA; Jason Hiles, MD
              MD, NRP; Michael D. April, MD, DPhil, MSc; F. Bowling,   ABSTRACT: The current forward surgical team (FST) operat-
              ATP, BHS; Paul D. Danielson, MD, FACS, FAAP; Andrew P.   ing table is heavy and burdensome and hinders essential move-
              Cap, MS, MD, PhD, FACP                             ment flexibility. A novel attachable rail system, the Shrail, has
                                                                 been developed to overcome these obstacles. The Shrail turns
              ABSTRACT:  Optimal fluid resuscitation  on the battlefield
              in the absence of blood products remains unclear. Contem-  a North Atlantic Treaty Organization litter into a functional
              porary Combat medics are generally limited to hydroxyethyl   operating table. A local FST compared the assembly of the
              starch or crystalloid solutions, both of which present signifi-  FST operating table with assembling the Shrail. Device weight,
              cant drawbacks. Obtaining US Food and Drug Administration   storage space, and assembly space were directly measured and
              (FDA)-approved freeze-dried plasma (FDP) is a top casualty   compared. The mean assembly time required for the Shrail was
              care research priority for the US Military. Interest in this agent   significantly less compared with the operating table (23.36
              reflects a desire to simultaneously expand intravascular vol-  versus 151.6 seconds; p ≤ .01). The Shrail weighs less (6.80kg
                                                                                                             3
              ume and address coagulopathy. The history of FDP dates to   versus 73.03kg) and requires less storage space (0.019m  ver-
                                                                          3
              the Second World War, when American expeditionary forces   sus 0.323m ) compared with the current FST operating table.
                                                                 The Shrail provides an FST with a faster, lighter surgical table
                                                                                 Then and Now: 20 Years In Publication  |  15
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22