Page 64 - JSOM Summer 2019
P. 64

Scott et al. used mixed methods to develop their own resilience   of trauma, though surely unintentional, imbued children with
          scale, based on the CD-RISC.  Their study is unique in that   main clinical domains of PTSD: hypervigilance, avoidance,
                                 59
          one SF Servicemember participated in the qualitative portion.   and dissociation. 44,63  The researchers’ choice to study effects
          Though Scott et al. used the CD-RISC in this study, they did   of war and PTSD on veterans’ children is interesting because
          not report quantitative results of participants’ CD-RISC scores   they assumed external forces caused transmitted trauma; first
          other than to describe CD-RISC factor analyses of their new   was war, upon the veteran, then second was the PTSD of the
          instrument in comparison. 59                       veteran transmitted to the child.  Although titular nomencla-
                                                                                      63
                                                             ture indicated Song et al. had concurrently studied resilience in
          Resilience was deemed present by Scott et al. if participants   this population, within the manuscript, “resilience” was only
          indicated in qualitative interviews that they attempted to over-  found in the title. 63
          come adversity.  The authors reported quantitative results for
                      59
          their investigator-created deployment stress scales, yet, regard-  In studying resilience in 20 Muslim Soldiers in the American
          ing the CD-RISC they used as an instrument of measurement,   military, Abu-Ras and Hosein  used grounded theory meth-
                                                                                     64
          their reporting of CD-RISC results was limited to qualitative   odology, and reported using that method for analysis of col-
          descriptions (e.g., “our factor analysis [of the CD-RISC] con-  lected data. As stated by the authors: “[G]rounded thematic
          firmed the single-construct integrity of [investigator-created]   analysis guided the processing of qualitative interview data,”
                                                                                                            64
          10 items.”  Scott et al. did not report numeric scores from   yet Abu-Ras and Hosein did not delve further into how
                  59
          extant resilience scales they administered to their participants   grounded theory specifically provided structure other than for
          (i.e., the CD-RISC, the PCL-M, and the post-traumatic growth   their analyses.  Abu-Ras and Hosein stated interest in specific
                                                                        64
          inventory. 59                                      demographic variables of possible influence, portending an
                                                             ethnographic approach as “ethnicity, rank, gender, [Muslim]
          Qualitative Literature on Resilience               conversion status, branches of service, immigration status, re-
          Qualitative military resilience research was scant but rich in   ligious disclosure, and the post-9/11 political climate” affected
          depth, and descriptions of what constitutes resilience were   their resilience differently than non-Muslim Servicemembers. 64
          more detailed and explicit in comparison with quantitative re-
          silience research. Participants in qualitative resilience research   Abu-Ras and Hosein identified spirituality and community as
          were more heterogenous demographically than in quantitative   central to resilience in Muslim military persons: “Islam’s defi-
          studies. In their study of 201 transgender veterans’ resilience,   nition of spirituality has a unique impact and may have differ-
          Chen et al.  described social structures as essential to resil-  ent meanings on [Muslim military persons’] resiliency.”  For
                                                                                                         64
                    60
          ience, namely community involvement, activism, social sup-  Muslims in the military, their spirituality may become a risk
          port, and interpersonal connections such as friendships and   factor, not a protective factor; several participants stated they
          relationships. They provide ample justification for their use   felt they had to hide their religious practices from military col-
          of minority stress theory, in which societal conditions (e.g.,   leagues,  especially after the attacks of September 11, 2001, in
                                                                   64
          stigma, prejudice, and discrimination) have deleterious effects   which middle-eastern persons killed thousands of Americans.
          on mental health.  Through thematic analysis, the authors de-  Islam provided deep senses of personal values and a sense of
                       60
          scribed transgendered veterans’ (per the authors’ description:   community when practiced within their faith communities,
          the transgendered community’s association accept “trans-  yet being an openly practicing Muslim in their military units
          vets” as an abbreviation) sense of resilience as exemplified by   sometimes resulted in Muslim Soldiers feeling ostracized by
          personal pride, being one’s authentic self, and overcoming ad-  non-Muslim colleagues. 64
          versity.  Participants cited military service as instrumental to
               60
          their resilience in overcoming obstacles as a trans-vet: “I am a   These themes suggest that when other military resilience re-
          warrior on multiple levels” and “The strength I gained in the   searchers hark to “spirituality” or “spiritual fitness” as a
          military has allowed me to transition.” 60         subscale construct or essential element of resilience, those
                                                             investigators implicitly imply a paradigm of Judeo-Christian
          Somasundaram and Sivayokan  studied resilience in north-  spirituality, which is widespread and accepted throughout the
                                   61
          ern Sri Lankan environments, in which citizens experienced   United States and its military. Muslim Servicemembers may
          and participated in over 30 years of combat, armed conflict,   feel the need to obfuscate their spirituality to remain resilient
          and displacement from their homes. Using an ethnographic   in their Servicemember roles, which, in turn, could negatively
          qualitative design, the authors found protective factors were   affect their resilience.
          instrumental in resilience; families remained intact, especially
          with strong matriarchal influences, in addition to participants   Discussion
          developing aesthetic narratives of their experience, which ap-
          peared to endow more hope in the participants.  Though eth-  We were unable to examine independent resilience research
                                               61
          nographic in design, Somasundaram and Sivayokan  used an   conducted specifically with populations of SOF personnel in
                                                  61
          ecological model to examine participant experiences. Using an   SOF units, because none exists at the time of this writing. To
          ethnographic paradigm would presumably emphasize partici-  our knowledge, in 32 studies of military resilience we exam-
          pants’ cultural influences over an ecological approach, which   ined, only one study had a participant who identified as SF in
          entails examining participants as embedded in micro- to mac-  a sample of more than 400.  Quantitative resilience research
                                                                                   59
          rosystems at corresponding levels. 61, 62          with military participants varied widely in defining resilience,
                                                             with resultant variance in how resilience was operationalized
          Among veterans of the Vietnam war, Song et al.  proposed   for measurement. Such disparity in definitions likely precludes
                                                 63
          the presence of PTSD affected those veterans’ children’s trau-  consistent  and accurate  measurement.  We found  one  qua-
          matic stress greater than veterans’ actual PTSD stemming   si-experimental study wherein resilience training was present
          from  personal involvement  in  direct combat.  Such  osmoses   in a specific group and compared with a nontreatment group


          62  |  JSOM   Volume 19, Edition 2 / Summer 2019
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69