Page 55 - JSOM Winter 2017
P. 55

Table 1  SOF Truths                                professionals, just as standard models for training large num-
              Truth 1: Humans are more important than hardware.  bers of troops are not designed to produce SOF.
              People, not equipment, make the critical difference. The right
              people, highly trained and working as a team, will accomplish the   The Army Medical Department (AMEDD) provides the major-
              mission with the equipment available. On the other hand, the best   ity of medical providers for combat deployments during times
              equipment in the world cannot compensate for a lack of the right   of war. It also simultaneously cares for millions of beneficia-
              people.                                            ries at military treatment facilities (MTFs) worldwide. Because
              Truth 2: Quality is better than quantity.          of the enormous  requirements  of  the beneficiary  mission,
              A few people, carefully selected, well trained, and well led, are   nonacute care constitutes the vast majority of medical provid-
              preferable to larger numbers of troops, some of whom may not be   ers’ experiences in garrison. Trauma does not fall into the top
              up to the task.                                    10 medical conditions at MTFs. The limited opportunity to
              Truth 3: SOF cannot be mass produced.              practice trauma care regularly “exacts a toll on the combat
              It takes years to train operational units to the level of proficiency   casualty care readiness mission,”  leaving medical providers
                                                                                           6
              needed to accomplish difficult and specialized SOF missions.
              Intense training in SOF schools and units is required to integrate   unpracticed in caring for acutely injured patients routinely.
              competent individuals into fully capable units. This process cannot
              be hastened without degrading ultimate capability.  Military surgeons, in particular, are debilitated by the defi-
              Truth 4: Competent SOF cannot be created after emergencies occur.  ciency of trauma and acute illness in their practice opportuni-
              Creation of competent, fully mission-capable units takes time.   ties. In 2015, the proportion of surgeries performed by Army
              Use of fully capable Special Operations capability on short notice   surgeons working at MTFs was 76% less than that performed
              requires highly trained and constantly available SOF units in   by their counterparts in civilian practice. This included far
              peacetime.                                         fewer major abdominal, head and neck, thoracic, and vascu-
              Truth 5: Most Special Operations require non-SOF assistance.  lar surgeries, which compose the anatomic center of gravity
              The operational effectiveness of our deployed forces cannot be,   for trauma surgery.  Most military trauma surgeons do not
                                                                                13
              and never has been, achieved without being enabled by our joint   practice trauma care regularly, instead caring for healthy ac-
              service partners. The support Air Force, Army, Marine, and Navy
              engineers, technicians, intelligence analysts, and the numerous   tive-duty Soldiers, dependents, and retirees on an elective and
              other professions that contribute to SOF have substantially   outpatient basis. Ironically, Army Reserve trauma surgeons
              increased our capabilities and effectiveness throughout the world.  are often better prepared to care for Combat wounded than
                                                                 their active-duty counterparts by virtue of being employed at
              providers  who seldom  care  for  acutely  injured  patients,  is   civilian trauma centers when not mobilized.
              limited in the Army inventory but critical to support SOF
              operations. 6                                      The AMEDD operates several “just-in-time,” predeployment,
                                                                 combat-trauma training courses to mitigate the lack of prac-
              High-quality outcomes in medical care are the result of high-  tice opportunities in trauma care. These include the week-long
              volume practice across the spectrum of surgical specialties,    Tactical Combat Medical Course, the 3-day Emergency War
                                                             7
              including trauma.  Studies have demonstrated the life-sav-  Surgery course, and 2-week rotations for deploying forward
                            8
              ing value of trauma professionals on the battlefield, as well.   surgical teams at the Army Trauma Training Center at Ry-
              In Iraq, a busy battalion aid station staffed by emergency   der Trauma Center in Miami, Florida. This is appropriate and
              medicine-trained personnel reported a 7.5% mortality rate,   essential training, but it falls short of the necessary years of
              compared with the higher theater mortality rate of 10.5%.    experience to develop individuals as true experts in trauma.
                                                             9
              Certified critical care flight paramedics reduced 48-hour mor-
              tality in medical flight operations by nearly 50% compared   The current model for training Army clinicians to provide
              with standard Army medical evacuation units. Poor surgical   deployed trauma care is suboptimal for the ARSOF mission.
                                                  10
              skills and judgment were found to be critical factors in 70% of   Most Army medical providers, because of the nature of the
              preventable deaths at a deployed Combat Support Hospital.    Army medical system, cannot be considered trauma profes-
                                                            11
              These study findings clearly suggest that better-trained medical   sionals and are not expert in care of civilian or combat trauma
              professionals provide higher-quality care and save more lives   patients. ARSOF, instead, is prepared to work with Army
              both in civilian and combat settings.              MEDCOM to create a new model for generating small teams
                                                                 of true experts in trauma care.
              High-quality trauma professionals ought to be the dominant
              concern  for manning and training  ARSOF  surgical teams.   SOF Truth 4: Competent Special Operations Forces
              High-quality trauma care by clinicians is acquired only after   Cannot Be Created After Emergencies Occur
              working full-time for many “years . . . at a high volume and
              best quality Level I trauma center.” 6,12          Competent ARSOF surgical teams, like other SOF units, can-
                                                                 not be created after the need arises. Just as successful military
                                                                 operations require upfront investments of time and resources,
              SOF Truth 3: Special Operations Forces
              Cannot Be Mass Produced                            so do successful trauma surgical team efforts require similar
                                                                 upfront investments in manning, equipping, and training be-
              Intensive training over many years is fundamental for SOF to ac-  fore emergencies occur.
              complish dangerous and difficult missions. The same is true for
              trauma professionals. Trauma surgeons complete a minimum   ARSOF trauma professionals should be recruited deliberately
              of 7 years of postgraduate training after medical school; other   and hand selected for performance and potential. The AMEDD
              trauma professionals have similarly demanding requirements.   Professional Filler System (PROFIS) for providing medical per-
              The standard training models for mass-producing military med-  sonnel to deploying units will be a significant obstacle to devel-
              ical providers are simply inadequate to produce ARSOF trauma   oping expert trauma teams within ARSOF. Inherent problems

                                                                                  SOF Truths for ARSOF Surgical Teams  |  53
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60