Page 51 - JSOM Winter 2017
P. 51

Staff Attitudes Regarding the Impact of a Therapy Dog Program
                                      on Military Behavioral Health Patients



                                                           1
                                        Sara M. Brisson, BA *; Anthony H. Dekker, DO 2










              ABSTRACT
              Background: Human–animal interactions in the form of ani-  social support because their  pets helped them manage their
              mal-assisted therapy (AAT) have become common in both ci-  feelings, distract from their symptoms, and provided encour-
              vilian and military healthcare facilities. Evidence supports AAT   agement for daily activity. 9,10
              as a beneficial therapeutic alternative for patients with physi-
              cal disabilities and psychological disorders. Few studies have   There is also a long history of AAT within US military health-
              been conducted in the civilian healthcare setting to evaluate   care facilities.  The US military first introduced the use of
                                                                            11
              staff attitudes regarding the impact of an AAT program on be-  dogs as a therapeutic intervention with psychiatric patients
              havioral health (BH) patients. To our knowledge, no research   in 1919 at St Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington, DC.  Since
                                                                                                           12
              has examined staff attitudes on the impact and effectiveness   that time, the popularity of AAT in the military as a treat-
              of AAT on active-duty Servicemembers in a BH program at   ment intervention has continued to increase. The use of AAT
              a military facility. Methods: At the completion of a year-long   is particularly common among physically injured Service-
              AAT dog program and after institutional review board exemp-  members and Servicemembers with psychological disorders,
              tion, an anonymous, six-question survey was used to examine   such as posttraumatic stress disorder.  Although there have
                                                                                              11
              staff attitudes (n = 29) regarding the impact and continuation   been some similar studies that have evaluated the attitudes of
              of the program with military BH patients. Results: Most staff   mental health professionals toward the knowledge and use of
              members (86%) believed the AAT dog program had a positive   AAT interventions in civilian  and military settings,  to our
                                                                                                          14
                                                                                       13
              impact on the BH patients, including improved patient mood,   knowledge, there has been no previous research evaluating be-
              greater patient relaxation, improved patient attitude toward   havioral health (BH) staff attitudes  regarding the impact of
              therapy, and increased social interactions among patients. All   an AAT dog program on military patients with BH diagnoses.
              the staff reported a desire to continue the program at the mili-  Moody et al.  evaluated attitudes about an AAT dog program
                                                                           15
              tary facility. Conclusion: Most BH staff thought the year-long   on a civilian pediatric ward. The staff felt the program effec-
              AAT dog program had a positive impact on patients. All staff   tively distracted children from their illnesses, relaxed the chil-
              supported continuation of the program.             dren, and made the ward a genuinely happier place for the
                                                                 children and the staff.  There does not appear to be any simi-
                                                                                  15
              Keywords:  animal-assisted therapy; therapy dog; military;   lar research from military healthcare facilities. The purpose of
              behavioral health; staff attitudes                 this study was to determine the attitudes of BH staff members
                                                                 regarding the impact of an AAT dog program on military BH
                                                                 patients and whether the program should be continued.
              Introduction
                                                                 Methods
              The first documented civilian use of animal-assisted therapy
              (AAT) occurred in 1792, when the Quakers used farm animals   After receiving institutional review board exemption, a highly
              as a therapeutic intervention for psychiatric patients in a men-  trained therapy dog was introduced into a military BH inpa-
                              1
              tal health institution.  Over the past two decades, the use of    tient and outpatient psychiatric unit in the summer of 2012.
              human–animal interactions in therapy, education, and health-  The service dog participated regularly in individual and group
                                                    2
              care has markedly increased in the United States.  The thera-  counseling sessions with active-duty Servicemembers as well
              peutic value of human–animal interactions, which includes   as during recreational activities and activities of daily living
              AAT, animal-assisted activities, and general animal interac-  (Figure 1). At the completion of 1 year of patient interaction
              tions, has been widely recognized and accepted because of the   with the therapy dog 2–3 days per week, an anonymous, six-
              reported physiological, psychological, and social benefits.    question survey was administered to BH staff to determine at-
                                                            2–5
              Benefits include decreases in blood pressure and pulse ; de-  titudes regarding the impact of the program on the patients
                                                         6,7
              creases in stress, anxiety, depression, and other mood disor-  (Figure 2). The staff was able to express their assessment re-
              ders 5,6,8 ; and improved social interactions and relations.  In   garding the impact of the program as positive, negative, or
                                                          2,5
              previous studies, individuals diagnosed with a severe mental   neither. They also could choose one or more examples of eight
              illness reported their pets were their primary and most valued   possible positive effects or five possible negative effects, as
              *Address correspondence to brisson@hartford.edu
              1 Ms Brisson was with Community House Mental Health Agency, Seattle, WA, and is currently with the Graduate Institute of Professional Psy-
                                         2
              chology (GIPP), University of Hartford.  Dr Dekker is with Northern Arizona Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Prescott, AZ.
                                                              49
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56