Page 187 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Winter 2015
P. 187

Building Community Resilience to Dynamic

                        Mass Casualty Incidents: A Multiagency White Paper
                                    in Support of the First Care Provider

                             The Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care;
                       FirstCareProvider.Org; The Koshka Foundation for Safe Schools


                         “Regular people are the most important people at a disaster scene, every time.”
                       —Amanda Ripley, The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes–and Why




                mpowered and trained  community members  can     subject matter experts, published their first guidelines
             Eserve a critical role as first care providers (FCPs)   discussing the FCP concept in 2011. The C-TECC pro-
              during the initial moments after complex and dynamic   cess and guidelines were modeled off of the successful
              disasters. These FCPs often have immediate access to   military Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guide-
              severely injured victims and can provide time-sensitive,   lines and modified to account for the unique aspects
              lifesaving interventions; the FCP is the first link in the   of civilian high threat response. In the military, TCCC
              trauma chain of survival. Public safety and first response   was most successful at reducing mortality rates when
              agencies must acknowledge this operational reality and   deployed as part of a comprehensive casualty manage-
              should lead the effort to integrate the FCP into whole of   ment system, such as the Ranger First Responder sys-
              community crisis response plans built upon the tiered   tem. However, the vast differences between civilian and
              application of the civilian Tactical Emergency Casualty   military operational response, the unique civilian pa-
              Care (TECC) medical guidelines. Utilizing TECC as the   tient populations, legal restrictions, and the differences
              foundation for FCP training facilitates continuity of care   in logistics and resources, preclude TCCC from direct
              not only for the patient but also the TECC trained pre-  application into civilian operations. The TECC guide-
              hospital care provider taking over care of the injured.   lines account for these unique aspects of civilian high-
                                                                 threat response and allow local leaders to effectively
                                                                 implement “whole of community” high-threat casualty
              Background
                                                                 response programs.
              Natural and manmade disasters are creating increasingly
              complex response challenges. The current US emergency   There is strong historical precedent in the United States
              response model relies heavily upon the availability and   and internationally for  the TECC FCP  concept. The
              expertise of highly trained public safety agencies. Too   transition of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from
              often, this leads the public and our leaders to assume   a hospital-based intervention to a whole of community
              that professional emergency medical care will be imme-  response paradigm is perhaps the most illustrative. Dr
              diately available. Unfortunately, there are often delays   Elam demonstrated that CPR was scientifically “sound”
              in first responders accessing victims, especially in com-  in 1954. In 1957, Dr Safar described the ABCs of re-
              plex high threat events (e.g., the attacks in Norway, the   suscitation, and in the 1960’s national medical associa-
              Aurora shootings, the Westgate Mall attack). Initiatives   tions, including American Red Cross, recognized CPR
              such as the Rescue Task Force model and the 3-ECHO   as the standard of care. In the 1970s, the CPR principles
              program are creating “warm zone/indirect threat care”   made their way to the public domain and in the past few
              operational paradigms for first responders and are an   years has evolved to “hands-only” CPR for nonmedical
              important first step in shortening the time from injury   first providers.  Over the decades, these bystander care
                                                                             2
              to first medical intervention. However, despite aggres-  principles have been proven effective and have evolved
              sive and expedient deployment of professional medical   to include automated external defibrillators and stroke
              providers, there remains a time gap from point of injury   recognition. Today there are millions of trained “by-
              to life saving intervention that only FCPs can address. 1  standers” across our country who can initiate cardiac
                                                                 resuscitation within seconds, can recognize the need,
              The Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (C-  access  and apply  an  automatic  external  defibrillator,
              TECC), a volunteer group of civilian operational medical   and can even perform a Cincinnati Stroke Scale on the



                                                             175
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192