Page 85 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Fall 2015
P. 85

Data were extracted by ISR, which provided the investigators   Figure 1  Study population.
              with the data encrypted and password protected. No personal
              health information (PHI) was accessed, and there was no mas-
              ter list with such information generated or maintained. Elec-
              tronic data were stored on a password-protected computer,
              and no hard data were collected or stored.

              Subject Population
              This investigation defines the specific physiologic variables on
              arrival to the Role 2/Role 3 emergency departments from the
              POI (POI transport group); or from Role 2/Role 3 hospital
              facilities to another Role 3 (intratheater transport group) for
              combat causalities in OEF between 1 January 2010 and 31
              December 2010 with an ISS greater than 15. By definition,
              all study patients survived transportation as the DoDTR only
              contains patients who are admitted alive to a Role 3 facility.
              The ISS is an analytical tool that assesses trauma in all body ar-
              eas and derives a composite score from the three most severely
              injured regions. An ISS greater than 15 represents a severely   Notes: POI = Point of Injury; BD = Base Deficit; INR = International
              injured patient. Subjects in this analysis included critically in-  Normalized Ratio.
              jured (ISS > 15) combat casualties transported in OEF whose
              biochemical markers (emergency department arrival BD and   Table 1  Critical Care Interventions
              INR) were recorded in the DoDTR database. Subjects were   Intervention                      No.
              US and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military
              personnel and did not include children, civilians, detainees, or   Ventilatory support/intubation  92
              non-NATO military personnel. Patients who do not meet these   Cricothyrotomy                 13
              criteria were not included.
                                                                 Double-lumen endotracheal tube            1
              Statistical Analysis                               Needle decompression/tube thoracostomy    29
              This study provides an analysis of described variables of cau-  Central venous access        3
              salities in the two study groups: POI transport and intratheater   Cardiopulmonary resuscitation  9
              transport. Emergency department BD and INR for patients
              were tested for significance between POI and intratheater   Total critical care interventions  147
              transports. Because the distribution for BD was skewed to the
              right and INR was skewed to the left, the t-test assumption of   n = 1), as well as prolonged flight time (e.g., 51 minutes, n =
              normality was violated and a rank-sum test was performed to   1). Other interventions performed during transport included
              compare POI parameters to intratheater parameters.  placement of peripheral intravenous lines, intraosseous lines,
                                                                 and tourniquets and initiation of supplemental oxygen. While
                                                                 these procedures can be lifesaving, they were not considered
              Results                                            critical care  interventions for the purposes of  this analysis

              There were 1198 transportation events among 626 total pa-  (Table 2).
              tients that were identified in the DoDTR for patients with an
              ISS greater than 15 in OEF between 1 January 2010 and 31   Of the POI transports, 478 (75.4%) had available data on
              December 2010. Patients had a mean age of 25.2 years (range   BD in the emergency department, with a mean value of –5.4
              18 to 51 years). Twelve casualties were from the US Air Force,   mEq/L (SD 6.78). Of intratheater transports, 521 (92.4%) had
              279 were from the US Army, 162 were from the US Marine   available data on BD, with a mean value of 0.68 mEq/L (SD
              Corps, 11 were from the US Navy, and 162 were from other   4.82), yielding a p value <.001 between POI and intratheater
              NATO forces. One hundred twenty-eight patients had a single   transports. Of POI transports, 214 (33.8%) had available data
              transportation event (e.g., single transport from POI to Role   on INR in the emergency department, with a mean value of
              2/3 MTF), and the remaining 498 had more than one trans-  1.48 (SD 0.71). Of intratheater transports, 507 (89.9%) had
              portation event (e.g., POI to Role 2, then Role 2 to Role 3). Of   available data on INR data, with a mean value of 1.21 (SD
              the 1198 total events, 634 (53%) were POI transports and 564   0.29), yielding a p value <.001 between POI and intratheater
              (47%) were intratheater transports (Figure 1).     transports.

              Critical care procedures performed during transportation (n   Discussion
              = 147, 12.3%) included intubation (n = 92), cricothyrotomy
              (n = 13), double-lumen endotracheal tube placement (n = 1),   This investigation helps quantify the number of patients who
              needle or tube thoracostomy (n = 29), central venous access   may benefit from a critical care skill set. These data demon-
              placement (n = 3), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 9)   strate that a significant number of troops transported during
              (Table 1). Critical clinical events during transport included   OEF required critical care interventions and that they showed
              airway emergencies (e.g., “extubated en route and vomited,”   significant improvement in BD and INR after resuscitation.


              Resuscitation During Critical Care Transportation in Afghanistan                                73
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90