Page 51 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Fall 2015
P. 51

Conceptualized Use of Self-Expanding Foam to
                   Rescue Special Operators From Abdominal Exsanguination

                           Percutaneous Damage Control for the Forward Deployed



                     Adam P. Rago, MS; Upma Sharma, PhD; Kyle Sims, BS, 18D; David R. King, MD





              ABSTRACT
              Background: Noncompressible hemorrhage is the leading   wounds.  Almost 90% of potentially survivable com-
                                                                        1–4
              cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield.   bat  deaths  occur  because  of inadequate  hemorrhage
              In Special Operations Forces (SOF), 50% of potentially   control, particularly at the point of injury or en route
              survivable deaths have been related to noncompressible   to a surgical capability. 3,5,6  Among potentially surviv-
              hemorrhage. Currently, there are no widely available   able battlefield casualties, noncompressible hemorrhage
              presurgical interventions that can slow abdominal bleed-  from the abdomen accounts for half of all deaths. 2,3,7–10
              ing. Consequently, many of the preventable deaths oc-  For patients with severe abdominal injury, rapid evacu-
              cur en route to definitive care as a failure to rescue from   ation to surgical care offers the best chance for survival.
              exsanguination. A self-expanding polyurethane foam
              has been developed as a percutaneous damage control   The need for far-forward hemorrhage control is perhaps
              intervention to rescue casualties who would otherwise   most pronounced for Special Operations warfighters;
              die of noncompressible hemorrhage, and allow them   in these locations, operational requirements and unique
              to survive long enough to reach surgical intervention.   environments complicate otherwise routine medical
              The purpose of this paper is to summarize the existing   challenges. Special Operations Forces (SOF) operate in
              preclinical data, describe the role of SOF personnel in   austere, far-forward environments, often far from orga-
              foam delivery-system development, and to integrate   nized surgical care. Mission requirements may prevent
              these together to conceptualize how foam could be in-  immediate evacuation of injured casualties and require
              corporated into SOF medical care. Methods: All exist-  improvised Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC). A
              ing publications on self-expanding foam are reviewed.   review of potentially survivable deaths in SOF personnel
              Additionally, eight SOF medical providers with combat   by Holcomb et al. found that 50% of SOF deaths were
              experience  provided  end-user  input  to  delivery-device   related to noncompressible hemorrhage, a rate consistent
              design through an interactive human-factors testing   with the military-wide Department of Defense Trauma
              process. Results: Ten preclinical publications described   Registry. 3,11  The failure to rescue such casualties signifies
              efficacy, safety, dose translation, and risk-benefit analy-  a clear and persistent capability gap for warfighters who
              sis of exsanguination rescue with percutaneous-foam   generally experience a lower killed-in-action and died-of-
              damage control. SOF medical providers guided weight,   wounds rate relative to the larger military population.
                                                                                                               12
              cubic, operational requirements, and limits for the foam   Thus, a significant unmet need exists for an intervention
              delivery device.  Conclusion:  Presurgical exsanguina-  that would prolong survival and enable evacuation to
              tion rescue with percutaneous foam damage control is   definitive surgical care for these casualties.
              safe and effective with a favorable risk-benefit profile
              in preclinical studies. Battlefield, presurgical use by SOF   To address this capability gap, a novel, self-expanding
              medical providers is conceptually possible. Adoption of   polyurethane foam (ResQFoam ) engineered to treat
                                                                                             ™
              the technology on the battlefield should proceed with   noncompressible abdominal hemorrhage in the presur-
              SOF medical provider input.                        gical environment has been developed. Foam treatment
                                                                 is intended as a temporary intervention (or hemostatic
              Keywords: hemorrhage, noncompressible; bleeding; foam;   bridge) to provide percutaneous damage control for ca-
              advanced medic; abdominal; austere; ResQFoam       sualties with severe abdominal hemorrhage, allowing
                                                                 these casualties to be rescued from prehospital exsan-
                                                                 guination and survive evacuation to a surgical capabil-
                                                                 ity.  The  foam  functions  by  mixing  two  liquid  phases
              Introduction
                                                                 during percutaneous injection into the peritoneal cavity
              Recent conflicts have exposed military personnel to   using a delivery system (Figure 1). The components re-
              devastating trauma from explosive devices and  gunshot   act in situ, creating a liquid that spreads throughout the



                                                              39
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56