Page 30 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Fall 2015

Inc. (www.airwaycam.com) has patents pending on the 15. Sulaiman L, Tighe SQ, Nelson RA. Surgical vs wire-guided
device. cricothyroidotomy: a randomised crossover study of cuffed
and uncuffed tracheal tube insertion. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:
565–570.
Disclaimer 16. Eisenburger P, Laczika K, List M, et al. Comparison of con-
ventional surgical versus Seldinger technique emergency
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the pri- crico thyroidotomy performed by inexperienced clinicians.
vate views of the authors and are not to be construed as Anesthesiology. 2000;92:687–690.
official or as reflecting the views of the US Department 17. Dimitriadis JC, Paoloni R. Emergency cricothyroidotomy: a
randomised crossover study of four methods. Anaesthesia.
of the Army or the US Department of Defense. This rec- 2008;63:1204–1208.
ommendation is intended to be a guideline only and is 18. Cho J, Kang GH, Kim EC, et al. Comparison of manikin ver-
not a substitute for clinical judgment. sus porcine models in cricothyroidotomy procedure training.
Emerg Med J. 2008;25:732–734.
19. Johnson DR, Dunlap A, McFeeley P, et al. Cricothyroidotomy
Disclosures performed by pre-hospital personnel: a comparison of two
techniques in a human cadaver model. Am J Emerg Med.
The authors have no disclosures. 1993;11:207–209.
20. Benkhadra M, Lenfant F, Nemetz W, et al. A comparison of
two emergency cricothyroidotomy kits in human cadavers.
References Anesth Analg. 2008;106:182–185.
21. Paix BR, Griggs WM. Emergency surgical cricothyroidot-
1. Spaite DW, Joseph M. Pre-hospital cricothyroidotomy: an in- omy: 24 successful cases leading to a simple ‘scalpel-finger-
vestigation of indications, technique, complications, and pa- tube’ method. Emerg Med Australas. 2012;24:23–30.
tient outcome. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:279–285. 22. Narrod JA, Moore EE, Rosen P. Emergency cricothyrostomy
2. Jacobson LE, Gomez GA, Sobieray RJ, et al. Surgical crico- technique and anatomical considerations. J Emerg Med. 1985;
thyroidotomy in trauma patients: analysis of its use by para- 2:443–446.
medics in the field. J Trauma. 1996;41:15–20. 23. Walls RM. Cricothyroidotomy. Emerg Med Clin North Am.
3. Fortune JB, Judkins DG, Scanzaroli D, et al. Efficacy of pre- 1988;6:725–736.
hospital surgical cricothyroidotomy in trauma patients. J 24. Dover K, Howdieshell TR, Colborn GL. The dimensions and
Trauma. 1997;42:832–836; discussion 837-838. vascular anatomy of the cricothyroid membrane: relevance to
4. Marcolini EG, Burton JH, Bradshaw JR, et al. A standing- emergent surgical airway access. Clin Anat. 1996;9:291–295.
order protocol for cricothyroidotomy in pre-hospital emer- 25. Skill station III: Cricothyroidotomy. In: Advanced Trauma
gency patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2004;8:23–28. Life Support for Doctors. ALTS Student Course Manual. 8th
5. Assmann NM, Wong DT, Morales E. A comparison of a new ed. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2008:52.
indicator-guided with a conventional wire-guided percutane- 26. Nessen SC, Lounsbury DE, Hetz SP, eds. Emergency Surgi-
ous cricothyroidotomy device in mannequins. Anesth Analg. cal Airway management. In: War Surgery in Afghanistan and
2007;105:148–154. Iraq. A series of cases, 2003–2007. Washington DC: Borden
6. Mabry RL. An analysis of battlefield cricothyroidotomy in Institute; 2006:25.
Iraq and Afghanistan. J Spec Oper Med. 2012;12:17–23. 27. Roberts JR, Hedges JR, eds. Cricothyroidotomy and trans-
7. Scrase I, Woollard M. Needle vs surgical cricothyroidot- tracheal jet ventilation. In: Clinical Procedures in Emergency
omy: a short cut to effective ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2006;61: Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2010:
962–974. 110–119.
8. Holmes JF, Panacek EA, Sakles JC, et al. Comparison 28. Mabry RL, Edens JW, Pearse L, et al. Fatal airway injuries
of 2 cricothyroidotomy techniques: standard method versus during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi
rapid 4-step technique. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32:442–446. Freedom. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14:272–277.
9. Davis DP, Bramwell KJ, Vilke GM, et al. Cricothyroid- 29. Goumas P, Kokkinis K, Petrocheilos J, et al. Cricothyroid-
otomy technique: standard versus the Rapid Four-Step Tech- otomy and the anatomy of the cricothyroid space. An autopsy
nique. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:17–21. study. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;354–356.
10. Schaumann N, Lorenz V, Schellongowski P, et al. Evaluation 30. MacIntyre A, Markarian MK, Carrison D, et al. Three-step
of Seldinger technique emergency cricothyroidotomy versus emergency cricothyroidotomy. Mil Med. 2007;172:1228–1230.
standard surgical cricothyroidotomy in 200 cadavers. Anes- 31. Braude D, Webb H, Stafford J, et al. The bougie-aided crico-
thesiology. 2005;102:7–11. thyroidotomy. Air Med J. 2009; 28:191–194.
11. King DR, Ogilvie MP, Velmahos G, et al. Emergent cricothy- 32. Hill C, Reardon R, Joing S, et al. Cricothyroidotomy technique
roidotomies for trauma: training considerations. Am J Emerg using gum elastic bougie is faster than standard technique: a
Med. 2012;30:1429–1432. study of emergency medicine residents and medical students
12. Kelly JF, Ritenour AE, McLaughlin DF, et al. Injury severity in an animal lab. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:666–669.
and causes of death from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Oper- 33. Abbrecht PH, Kyle RR, Reams WH, et al. Insertion forces
ation Enduring Freedom: 2003-2004 versus 2006. J Trauma. and risk of complications during cricothyroid cannulation. J
2008;64(2 Suppl):S21–26; discussion S26–27 Emerg Med. 1992;10:417–426.
13. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battle- 34. Chan TC, Vilke GM, Bramwell KJ, et al. Comparison of
field (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat ca- wire-guided cricothyroidotomy versus standard surgical cri-
sualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5): cothyroidotomy technique. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:957–962.
S431–437. 35. Fikkers BG, van Vugt S, van der Hoeven JG, et al. Emergency
14. Mariappa V, Stachowski E, Balik M, et al. Cricothyroidot- cricothyroidotomy: a randomised crossover trial comparing
omy: comparison of three different techniques on a porcine the wire-guided and catheter-over-needle techniques. Anaes-
airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:961–967. thesia. 2004;59:1008–1011.

18 Journal of Special Operations Medicine Volume 15, Edition 3/Fall 2015