Page 95 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2015
P. 95

Battlefield Analgesia:
                                TCCC Guidelines Are Not Being Followed



                                  Steven G. Schauer, DO, RDMS; John B. Robinson, PA;
                                       Robert L. Mabry, MD; Jeffrey T. Howard, PhD







              ABSTRACT

              Background: Servicemembers injured in combat often   and more effective methods of pain control have been
              experience moderate to severe acute pain. Early and ef­  described and were recommended by the Committee on
              fective pain control in the prehospital setting has been   Tactical Combat Casualty Care in October 2013 (previ­
              shown to reduce the sequelae of untreated pain. Current   ous TCCC guidelines).
              data suggest that lack of point­of­injury (POI) analge­
              sia has significant, downstream effects on healthcare   Importance
              quality and associated costs. Methods: This was a pro­  Battlefield analgesia has remained a challenging issue in
              cess improvement project to determine the current rate   the field of combat medicine since the wars in Iraq and
              of adherence to existing prehospital pain management   Afghanistan began. In our experience, the importance of
              guidelines. The records of patients who had sustained   analgesia appears to have been underemphasized in the
              a major injury and met current Tactical Combat Casu­  past, mostly due to the fact that it is not a lifesaving in­
              alty Care (TCCC) criteria for POI analgesia from July   tervention and administration is low in the sequence of
              2013 through March 2014 were reviewed to determine   casualty treatment. Due to fears of respiratory and car­
              if pain medication was given in accordance with exist­  diac depression and the potential of worsening shock,
              ing guidelines, including medication administration and   opioid analgesics are often underdosed by combat medi­
              routes. On 31 October 2013, the new TCCC guidelines   cal personnel. Misuse or abuse of narcotics is a concern
              were released. The “before” period was from July 2013   and leads to some medics being issued only one or two
              through October 2013. The “after” period was from   doses of morphine. Pain is regarded as a symptom in­
              November 2013 through March 2014. Results: During   stead  of  a  disease  process.  Lack  of  analgesia  in  close
              the project period, there were 185 records available for   proximity to the injury appears to cause both peripheral
              review, with 135 meeting TCCC criteria for POI analge­  and central sensitization, which lead to changes in neu­
              sia (68 pre­, 66 postintervention). Prior to 31 October   roplasticity, and to chronic pain and posttraumatic stress
              2013, 17% of study patients received analgesia within   disorder (PTSD).  Previous military­based research has
                                                                               1
              guidelines at the POI compared with 35% in the after   shown a strong association between lack of acute anal­
              period. The most common medication administered pre­   gesia and the development of PTSD.  The after effects
                                                                                                 2
              and post­release was oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.   of underdosing can have significant effects on Soldiers’
              Special Operations Forces had higher adherence rates   and Veterans’ quality of life, speed of recovery, and re­
              to TCCC analgesia guidelines than conventional forces,   habilitation.  Increasing the risk of downstream chronic
                                                                           3
              but these still were low. Conclusion: Less than half of   diseases likely leads to an increase in overall healthcare
              all eligible combat casualties receive any analgesia at the   costs and utilization.
              POI. Further research is needed to determine the etiol­
              ogy of such poor adherence to current TCCC guidelines.  Goals of This Project
                                                                 The primary objective of this project was to determine
              Keywords: analgesia, point of injury, combat, fentanyl, ket-  the adherence of caregivers to Tactical Combat Casual
              amine, morphine, military                          Care (TCCC) analgesia recommendations before and
                                                                 after the release of the TCCC guidelines during this
                                                                 project period. Table 1 outlines the relevant TCCC
                                                                 guidelines on analgesia. We also sought to compare an­
              Introduction
                                                                 algesia use by conventional forces (CON) versus Special
              Background                                         Operations Forces (SOF), as the latter typically have
              Intramuscular morphine sulfate has been the primary   medics with a wider scope of practice. Additionally, we
              battlefield analgesic since the American Civil War. Safer   sought to describe the challenges to achieving adequate



                                                              85
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100