Page 147 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Fall 2014
P. 147

CAT  application or result in loosening (e.g., other Vel-  Assembly. As always, the first day is open to the pub-
              cro), and the universal requirement to move the casu-  lic. Please contact the Committee through the website
              alty. Further, if you train single routing, there exists a   at www.c-tecc.org with any concerns, questions, or sug-
              higher risk that, under stress, the rescuer will apply only   gested topics for the upcoming meeting.
              through the outer loop. This means a very thin piece of
              plastic is the only thing bearing all of the pressure of the
              constriction band. Again, slippage or fracture will result   References
              in catastrophic failure and loss of hemorrhage control.   1.  Kotora JG Jr, Henao J, Littlejohn LF, Kircher S. Vented chest
              Single-loop application on the lower extremity may   seals for prevention of tension pneumothorax in a commu-
              have some role in extremely time-constrained scenarios.   nicating pneumothorax. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:686–694.
              However, this situation should be rare and the C-TECC   2.  Kheirabadi BS, Terrazas IB, Koller A, et al. Vented versus
              continues to recommend utilization of both loops in the   unvented chest seals for treatment of pneumothorax and
                                                                   prevention of tension pneumothorax in a swine model. J
              friction bar (i.e., double looping) on lower extremity ap-  Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:150–156.
              plication of the CAT. Proper training is critical, and the   3.  Clumpner BR, Polston RW, Kragh JF Jr, et al. Single ver-
              C-TECC believes it can mitigate the slightly increased   sus double routing of the band in the Combat Application
              time of application for double looping.              Tourniquet. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13:34–41.


              Conclusion
              C-TECC will hold its winter meeting on 8 December 2014
              at the Special Operations Medical Association  Scientific






                              The Ongoing Evolution (Revolution) of TEMS


                                          Philip A. Carmona, NREMT-P, TP-C, RN





                  lobally, military tactical medical practices and asso-  relevant tactical medical practices. Notions of military
             Gciated kits have been moving into the nonmilitary   tactical medical practice, both real and perceived, are both
              Tactical Emergency Medical Support (TEMS) commu-   synergizing and impeding the transfer of relevant medical
              nities at a relatively quicker pace than in previous con-  practice to the TEMS community in the United States.
              flicts. The previous long-term conflicts (Vietnam, the
              Cold War) saw a relatively slower transfer of medically   Particularly problematic in the nonmilitary tactical
              relevant areas to nonmilitary medical practice.    medi  cal community is the degree to which organization,
                                                                 training, protocols, scope of practice issues, statues,
              One possible factor is the use of digital media as a means   and regulations differ between municipalities, counties,
              to transfer areas of medical relevance to the nonmilitary   states, and agencies. These differences greatly impede the
              medical community. Unlike the conflicts since Vietnam,   interoperability common to most military organizations.
              the current conflict has also seen the use of Reserve and
              National Guard medical personnel alongside their ac-  Throughout the United States, the drive to be prepared
              tive counterparts; this factor has also made for a more   for active shooter and other crisis-related situations has
              efficacious transfer of tactical medical practices to the   significantly increased the demand for TEMS training
              nonmilitary tactical medical community. Many Reserve   (and associated funding). However, the lack of training
              and  Guard  medical  personnel  step  back  into  similar   standardization, bureaucratic issues, varying local prac-
              practices when they return home postdeployment.    tices at the differing levels of governance, and funding
                                                                 issues have further impeded the more efficient transfer
              However, differences in organization, training, protocols,   and acceptance of relevant and needed tactical medical
              scope of practice issues, statues, and regulations between   practices. The following chart gives a brief overview of
              military practitioners and their nonmilitary counter-  general characteristics of military and nonmilitary tacti-
              parts act as brakes to a more efficient transfer and use of    cal medical governance and practices.



              TacMed Updates                                                                                 139
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152