Page 143 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Fall 2014
P. 143

Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care
                                           (C-TECC) Update: Fall 2014



                                           David Callaway, MD; Reed Smith, MD;
                              Geoff Shapiro, EMT-P; Joshua Bobko, MD; Sean McKay, EMT-P






              JUNE 2014 TECC GUIDELINES
              COMMITTEE MEETING

              The Johns Hopkins Center for Law Enforcement Medi-  C-TECC recommends the employment of a tiered strat-
              cine and Division of Special Operations in Baltimore   egy for chest decompression that includes techniques
              generously hosted the June 2014 Committee for Tacti-  such as needle decompression, burping of the wound,
              cal Emergency Casualty Care meeting (C-TECC). The   or, rarely (and with proper protection and training),
              C-TECC meeting focused on several critical issues in-  finger thoracostomy. Standard emergency medical ser-
              cluding guideline updates, review of C-TECC member   vices (EMS) practice already accounts for most of these
              involvement in recent federal efforts regarding active vi-  changes, so existing  protocols based  on the National
              olent incidents, examination of national best practices,   Education Standards do not necessarily need to be up-
              and new partnership agreements.                    dated. If an agency is considering developing a new
                                                                 standard operating procedure for management of pen-
                                                                 etrating  chest  trauma  or  updating equipment  stocks,
              Guideline Updates
                                                                 vented chest seals likely offer some clinical advantage
              Updated language will be added to www.c-tecc.org.  without a significant difference in cost.

              Vented Chest Seals                                 Penetrating Eye Injuries
              Recently, based on two laboratory animal trials (Evi-  Given the infrequency of eye injuries, the availability of
              dence  Level  C),  the  CoTCCC  changed  the  recom-  rapid access to emergency medicine or ophthalmology
              mendations for management of open pneumothorax/    specialists, and member input on existing civilian pro-
              penetrating chest trauma to emphasize the use of vented   tocols, the C-TECC has simplified recommendations for
              chest seals. In their study, Kotora et al. created a surgical   eye injury management. During the public comment pe-
              thoracostomy, sealed the hole, and then infused a com-  riod, several guests questioned the utility of field visual
              bination of air and blood into the chest cavity. The study   acuity tests in the civilian setting. In most situations,
              found that the HyFin, Sentinel, and SAM chest seals all   people thought that this simply added time to the evacu-
              effectively prevented development of tension physiol-  ation and provided little additional clinical information.
              ogy.  A second laboratory animal trial by Kheirabadi et   New recommendations call for simply protecting the
                 1
              al. demonstrated that violation of the chest wall created   eye from external pressure and stabilizing the object (if
              immediate respiratory distress (presumably be eliminat-  present). As with all recommendations, the tactical and
              ing the negative pressure gradient required for proper   operational scenario should inform clinical decisions.
              respiration). Occlusion of the hole immediately restored
              normal  respiratory  mechanics.  However,  serial  air  in-  Pediatric Populations
              jections resulted in tension physiology in models with   While jurisdictions across the county and internationally
              nonvented chest seals. Vented chest seals prevented this   are racing to improve their response to Active Violence
                      2
              outcome.  Based on these two trials, the C-TECC has   Incidents (AVIs), there has been a long-standing lack of
              added language to include the use of vented chest seals   guidance with respect to treatment of nontraditional
              if available. Unlike CoTCCC, C-TECC guidelines com-  populations. While AVIs should not dominate guidance
              mittee did not believe that clear superiority in terms of   on trauma care, increased awareness of these events
              clinical  outcome  with  vented  versus  nonvented chest     provides an opportunity to drive a paradigm shift in the
              seals with a comprehensive decompression strategy.   prehospital treatment of these patients. Within the past
              In the civilian setting, with relatively short transport   2 years, events involving public locations (e.g., schools,
              times, the likelihood of developing a fatal tension pneu-  churches, and theaters) have attracted the attention of
              mothorax remains rare, even in cases of penetrating   the national media. Most, if not all, have involved pe-
              chest trauma. If an agency is using occlusive chest seals,    diatric casualties. In 2013, the C-TECC formally stood



                                                             135
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148