Page 42 - JSOM Winter 2023
P. 42

Regarding clips versus strap rethreading through the redirect   encountered. Failure to understand key concepts and optimal
          buckle, clip systems had the fastest “Go” to “touch tightening   techniques does not generally equate with the best outcomes
          system” individual and median times for all and problem-free   when people are faced with physical tasks that require some
          applications. Not all clips are equivalent: clip recognition   deviation from how the task was done in a controlled setting.
          problems were prevalent with the TMT and non-existent with
          the X8T, and unclipping/reclipping problems were the least   Limitations
          frequent with the SOFTTW5, though the most frequent with   This study has the limitations associated with the pre-study de-
                                    1
          the similar clip of the SOFTTW3.  Unthreading and rethread-  cisions detailed in the discussion section of the companion pa-
                                                                                             1
                                                                1
          ing of a self-securing redirect buckle was not as fast as unclip-  per.  In addition to the shared limitations, collecting time data
          ping and reclipping a self-securing redirect buckle and offered   related to specific design features requires discrete, identifiable
          the unfortunate opportunity for rethreading problems. 1  starting and stopping actions for those features. This resulted
                                                             in times for use of the entire strap/redirect system without sep-
          Time from “touch tightening system” to “occlusion” was faster   arate  times  for clip  use. Another  limitation-imposing  choice
          with windlass rod systems, but “touch tightening system” to   was what to do regarding times for event failures. Not includ-
          “Done” was faster with self-securing systems by a larger mar-  ing a time for an event failure would result in misleadingly fast
          gin and avoided questionable rod security issues. Additionally,   times for that tourniquet for that event; therefore, we chose to
          34 windlass rod system applications that did not involve a   use 300 seconds, the maximum allowable application time as
          tightening system understanding problem had variable length   the time for event failures.
          occlusion losses between achieving occlusion and completing
          the application. These occlusion losses are indicated by sepa-  Conclusions
          rate first and last occlusion times (Figure 3, differences from
          0.13 to 73.41 seconds). In 18 applications, the occlusion losses   Suboptimal tourniquet application processes increase applica-
          were associated with losing hold of the rod or resetting the   tion times. Suboptimal strap tightness from the strap/redirect
          rod. Other causes of these occlusion losses were the backward   system part of the application process negatively affects all as-
          movement of the rod during the securing process and the time   pects of the tightening system use part of the application pro-
          spent achieving rod securing.  Beyond the faster tightening   cess.  Among nonelastic, non-pneumatic  emergency-use  limb
                                 25
          system  completion  times  and  prevention  of  rod  security  is-  tourniquets, optimal design features for fast, occlusive, secure
          sues, two additional advantages to the self-securing tightening   tourniquet applications are self-securing strap/redirect systems
          systems would be the finer resolution securable pressure in-  with an easily identifiable and easily used clip and self-secur-
          crements and the ease of additional tightening whenever indi-  ing tightening systems.
          cated with no need to un-secure and then resecure a windlass
          rod with the additional risk of releasing the tightening system   Acknowledgments
          because of rod slippage.                           The authors thank the following Drake University undergrad-
                                                             uates of the Trauma Research Team for their help carrying out
          From our results concerning scoring and timing the processes   the experiments: Jared Defriend, Mikayla Soelter,  Amanda
                                      1
          involved in tourniquet application around a “trapped” limb,   Gregory, Bryan Williams, Mia Fidanze, Erin O’Keefe, Quynh
          we conclude the following: 1) For nonelastic, non-pneumatic   Pham, Lindsey Skerrett, Kristen Skriver, Erin Steffenson, Dani
          emergency-use limb tourniquets, the best combination of   Eernisse, Jack Libbesmeier, Kayla Markuson,  Taylor Rent-
          design features for most frequently achieving the fastest oc-  schler, and Stephanie Richardson.
          cluded and secure tourniquet applications would be an easily
          identified and used clip, a self-securing strap redirect buckle   Disclosures
          (unidirectional friction would be preferred but is not a cur-  None of the authors have any financial relationships relevant
          rent tourniquet option to our knowledge), and a self-securing   to this article to disclose, and there was no outside funding.
                                                                                                      1
          tightening system (either parallel to the limb dial rotation or   As indicated in the methods of the companion paper,  tourni-
          perpendicular to the limb buckle advancement on a ladder). 2)   quets were requested from manufacturers or distributors, and
          Tourniquet training for the public should include tourniquets   seven of the eight models of tourniquets were donated. PW,
          with clips, self-securing redirect buckles, and self-securing   CB, and JD are paid by their respective institutions, and the
          tightening systems. Teaching and supplying only windlass rod   other authors were volunteer researchers. None of the authors
          style tourniquets for public “Stop the Bleed” kits is subopti-  has stock in any tourniquet companies, and none do any paid
          mal if maximizing the percentage of applications that are oc-  consulting with any tourniquet companies. The authors talk
          clusive, secure, and fast is desired. 3) When strap rethreading   to and share data with any and all companies and individuals
          can happen, a diagram of the rethreading should be placed   who are interested and do not keep any secrets. The lab equip-
          on the strap because once the strap has been unthreaded, the   ment belongs to Drake University and UnityPoint Health Iowa
          threading pattern can no longer be seen to be copied. 4) For   Methodist Medical Center.
          individuals supplied with a specific tourniquet, training should
          include avoiding errors that are easy, common, or important   Author Contributions
          with that specific tourniquet (examples, failure to open all the   PW and CB contributed to concept development and project
                                 1
          hook-and-loop of the TMT,  failure to correctly secure the   design.  All authors contributed to the acquisition, analysis,
          windlass rod of the CAT7,  or grasping the releasing mech-  and interpretation of data and the drafting and revising of the
                                1
                                      1
          anism of the RST during tightening ). 5) Training for people   article. All authors had final approval of the manuscript.
          who might encounter any type of tourniquet should empha-
          size key concepts.  Educating potential tourniquet users on key   References
                        1
          concepts and optimal techniques is more likely to allow users   1.  Wall P, Buising B, Jensen J, et al. Effects of tourniquet features on
          to achieve the best applications allowed by the circumstances   application processes. J Spec Oper Med. 2023;23(4):11–30.
          40  |  JSOM   Volume 23, Edition 4 / Winter 2023
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47