Page 49 - JSOM Fall 2024
P. 49
The German and Belgian standards are interesting, as they re- Spondylolisthesis above grade I seems to worsen and become
22
quire the use of a full-spine X-ray only if there are warning increasingly symptomatic as more jumps are made. In our
signs during the clinical examination. In this study, only 1.6% study, the only enlisted soldier with an anterior listhesis of
(66) of full-spine X-ray recipients were unfit for static jump grade 2 was requesting an invalidity pension for low back pain.
training. Since performing a full-spine X-ray is irradiating, is
it wise to perform this examination systematically? The intro- Conclusion
duction of systematic full-spine X-rays for military airborne
personnel is recent (MI 700 was published in 2008). Of the 3,993 candidates found to be medically acceptable
for service and who underwent full-spine X-rays, 97.5%
These studies and our study favor expanding spine X-ray med- (n=3,893) were fit for static-line jumps and 2.5% (n=100)
ical standards to include scoliosis with an angle of 20°, while were unfit. Sixty-six enlisted personnel (1.6%) were unfit be-
focusing medical selection on clinical examination. cause they were found to not meet the MI 700 standard on
full-spine X-ray: 53 had scoliosis greater than 15°, and 13
The Search for a New Threshold had spondylolisthesis (grades II or III). The data we gathered,
Of the 4,115 spine X-rays reviewed, 70 (1.7%) examples of supported by a literature review that included foreign armies,
scoliosis with an angle between 16° and 20° were described. shows that low back pain and spondylolisthesis above grade I
Of 16 enlisted personnel who were diagnosed with scoliosis of are more significant than scoliosis and kyphosis when consid-
between 16° and 21° and were medically accepted for airborne ering airborne standards.
duty, none reported low back pain or trauma following a para-
chute jump in 2016. Author Contributions
MR, WG, TG, and AL participated in the study conception
Those facts lead us to propose a new threshold for scoliosis, and design. MR and WG acquired the data, and MR, RL, WG,
with an angle of up to 20° (measured by the Cobb method), BK, TG, and AL analyzed it. MR, WG, and RL in drafted the
which is in line with U.S. Army standards. Medical unaccept- manuscript, and BK, TG, and AL revised it.
ability will remain for scoliosis with an angle above 20°, as
measured by the Cobb method. Disclosures
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Reproducibility and Quality of Radiological
Interpretation of Spine X-Rays Funding
Three enlisted personnel whose spine X-rays initially presented No funding was received for this work.
scoliosis with an angle above 20° repeated the procedure in a
civil clinic; the second X-rays measured an angle less than or References
equal to 15°. The reproducibility of this examination seems to 1. Samy J, Queyran X, Aigle L. Fractures induites par le saut à ouver-
depend on the operator, the correct position of the subject, the ture automatique. Étude des blessés sur 4 ans et 44 000 sauts
comprehension of the posture required for a correct full-spine suivis au centre médical des armées de Calvi. Médecine et Armées.
2014;42(2):163–70. doi:10.17184/eac.6989
X-ray, and finally, on reading errors. In 2022, this problem of 2. Sahin T, Batın S. A descriptive study of orthopaedic injuries due to
15
reproducibility led to the recommendation to perform a com- parachute jumping in soldiers. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1):58.
plementary assessment by EOS system (EOS Imaging, Paris, doi:10.1186/s12873-020-00354-7
France) for scoliosis between 15° and 20° and kyphosis be- 3. Ministère de la défense, Direction des ressources humaines de
tween 50° and 60°. Indeed, EOS seems to be a more accurate l’armée de Terre: bureau « politique des ressources humaines ». In-
16
examination to assess the degrees of scoliosis and kyphosis. struction ministérielle n° 812 relative aux normes médicales d’ap-
A study is currently underway to evaluate whether this differ- titude applicables au personnel militaire de l’armée de Terre du 15
septembre 2014. (BOEM 312.2.1, 620-4.1.5.1).
ence between full-spine X-ray and EOS is found in enlisted 4. Ministère de la défense, Direction centrale du service de santé des
personnel and whether this difference is significant. armées: sous-direction « plans-capacités »; bureau « médecine
d’armée ». Instruction ministérielle n° 700 relative à l’aptitude
Spondylolisthesis and Static-Line Jumps médicale à la pratique du parachutisme militaire du 8 octobre 2015.
In 1967, Teyssandier described the distinctive vertebral injuries (BOEM 620-4.1.2.2).
of paratroopers as a trauma located on the spine but with no 5. Knapik J, Steelman R. Risk factors for injuries during military static-
line airborne operations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J
radiological signs of vertebrae fracture that could be qualified Ath Train. 2016;51(11):962–980. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.9.10
as an occupational disease. Associated factors were spondy- 6. Neves EB, de Souza MN, de Almeida RM. Military parachuting in-
lolisthesis at L5–S1, morphological and transition anomalies juries in Brazil. Injury. 2009;40(8):897–900. doi:10.1016/j.injury.
(fusion, hemivertebrae), and sometimes, scoliosis with a right 2009.01.136
rotation. These data were later confirmed by a 2003 study 7. Zakowski B, Wagner I, Domzalski M. Analysis of a military par-
17
‡
that found the same risk factors for low back pain among achutist injury – a retrospective review of over 37,000 landings
18
non-paratroopers. In 1991, a case report identified three cases [published correction appears in Mil Med. 2019 Mar 1;184(3–4):
112. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy416]. Mil Med. 2019;184(1–2):e261–
of symptomatic bilateral spondylolysis after static-line military e265. doi:10.1093/milmed/usy315
jumps, and, although it did not find significant evidence, it 8. Steele JR, Mickle KJ, Whitting JW. Preventing injuries associated
questioned the need for an exclusion of this pathology during with military static-line parachuting landings. In: Gefen A, ed.
initial medical selection. 19 The Mechanobiology and Mechanophysiology of Military-Related
Injuries. Springer; 2015:37–68. Studies in Mechanobiology, Tis-
sue Engineering and Biomaterials. Accessed November 26, 2017.
Other studies conducted between 2003 and 2013 have identified https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/8415_2015_184
radiological modification as degenerative changes in the lumbar 9. Mayet A, Bay C, Salivas A, et al. Accidents de parachutisme dans
spine, mainly at the T12 level, with no clinical correlation and les unités aéroportées de la Région Terre Sud-Ouest 2004–2005.
spondylolysis at L5–S1 that could also be degenerative. 20–22 Médecine et Armées. 2009;37(1):3–9.
Radiological Assessment in French Paratrooper Training: A 5-Year Study | 47

