Page 31 - JSOM Fall 2024
P. 31

References                                         9.  Ryan K, George D, Liu J, Mitchell P, Nelson K, Kue R. The use
              1.  Pepper M, Archer F, Moloney J. Triage in complex, coordinated   of field triage in disaster and mass casualty incidents: A survey
                terrorist attacks.  Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(4):442–448.   of current practices by EMS personnel.  Prehosp Emerg Care.
                doi:10.1017/S1049023X1900459X                       2018;22(4):520–526. doi:10.1080/10903127.2017.1419323
              2.  Garner A, Lee A, Harrison K, Schultz CH. Comparative analysis   10.  Rush S, Lauria MJ, DeSoucy E, et al. Limitations of triage in
                of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms. Ann Emerg Med.   military mass casualty response: a case series. J Spec Oper Med.
                2001;38(5):541–548. doi:10.1067/mem.2001.119053     2024;24(3):62–66.
              3.  Cross KP, Cicero MX. Head-to-head comparison of disaster triage   11.  SALT mass casualty triage: concept endorsed by the American
                methods in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients. Ann Emerg Med.   College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Surgeons
                2013;61(6):668-676.e7. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.023  Committee on Trauma, American Trauma Society, National As-
              4.  McKee CH, Heffernan RW, Willenbring BD, et al. Comparing the   sociation of EMS Physicians, National Disaster Life Support
                accuracy of mass casualty triage systems when used in an adult   Education Consortium, and State and Territorial Injury Preven-
                population.  Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020;24(4):515–524. doi:10.   tion  Directors Association.  Disaster Med Public Health Prep.
                1080/10903127.2019.1641579                          2008;2(4):245–246. doi:10.1097/DMP.0b013e31818d191e
              5.  Heffernan RW, Lerner EB, McKee CH, et al. Comparing the ac-  12.  Vayer JS, Ten Eyck RP, Cowan ML. New concepts in triage. Ann
                curacy of mass casualty triage systems in a pediatric population.   Emerg Med. 1986;15(8):927–930. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(86)
                Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019;23(3):304–308. doi:10.1080/1090312  80677-1
                7.2018.1520946                                   13.  Kosequat J, Rush SC, Simonsen I, et al. Efficacy of the mnemonic
              6.  National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians. PHTLS:   device “MARCH PAWS” as a checklist for pararescuemen during
                Prehospital Trauma Life Support. Military 8th ed. Jones & Bartlett   tactical field care and tactical evacuation. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;
                Learning; 2014.                                     17(4):80–84. doi:10.55460/4R92-ESFR
              7.  Shackelford SA, Remley MA, Keenan S, et al. Evidence-based princi-  14.  Bryan CJ, Rush SC, Fuessel-Herrmann D, et al. Threat appraisal,
                ples of time, triage and treatment: Refining the initial medical response   recovery operations, and PTSD symptoms among US Air Force
                to massive casualty incidents. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;93(2S   rescue personnel. J Spec Oper Med. 2023;23(1):18–22. doi: 10.
                Suppl 1):S160–S164. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000003699  55460/P58K-BDYT
              8.  Kamler JK, Taube S, Koch EJ, et al. Effectiveness of and adherence
                to triage algorithms during prehospital response to mass casualty   PMID: 39271298; DOI: 10.55460/X38F-P3RH
                incidents. J Spec Oper Med. 2023;23(1):60–67.
























































                                                                Prehospital Strategy for MASCALs: Move, Treat, and Transport  |  29
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36