Page 75 - 2022 Spring JSOM
P. 75

TABLE 1  Amputation Time per Extremity in Seconds, Amputation Location, Success Rate, and Extremity Diameter
                                  Distal   Proximal   Distal   Proximal   Distal    Proximal   Distal    Proximal
              Knife Tool         Forearm   Forearm  Humerus    Humerus   Tib/Fib    Tib/fib    Femur     Femur
              Leatherman Multitool  102 s   62 s      62 s      108 s    70 s, 94 s  94 s      Fail       Fail
              Tree Hopper
              Field knife         118 s     94 s      50 s      68 s       44 s    119 s, Fail  Fail      Fail
              Victorinox Rescue tool  42 s,102 s  119 s  65 s   Fail       83 s      Fail      Fail       Fail
              SOG Fixed blade      27 s     Fail    108 s, Fail  118 s     83 s      Fail      Fail       Fail
              Location success rate  100%   75%       80%       75%       100%      40%         0%        0%
              Mean Limb
              Diameter cm       5.7 (SD 0.4) 8.5 (SD 0.3) 8.5 (SD 0.3) 10.4 (SD 0.5) 7.4 (SD 0.8) 10.8 (SD 0.5) 12.7 (SD 0.4) 15.2 (SD 0.4)
              The amputation time is shown for each amputation site in seconds and tool used, success rates are shown in percentages, and limb diameter is in
              centimeters (cm) with standard deviation in cm (SD).


              amputation success rate was with the Leatherman Super Tool   On the postamputation questionnaire, the Leatherman multi-
              300, followed by the TreeHopper 3-in-1 Field Dress Knife, the   tool received a statistically significant higher score for the
              Swiss Army Rescue Tool, and finally, the SOG Pentagon fixed   questions, “Which knife performed the complete amputation
              blade knife (Table 2).                             the best?” and “Which knife saw cut through the bone the
                                                                 best?” (p = .001). For the remaining two questions (“Which
              TABLE 2  Amputation Success and Fail Rates With Odds Ratio and   knife cut through the soft tissue the best?” and “Which knife
              95% Confidence Intervals                           was the most ergonomically comfortable to amputate with?”),
                                     Success   Odds              there was no clear preference (Table 3).
                        Successful Fail  Rate  Ratio  95% CI
              Leatherman   7     2    78%     3.5  [0.727–16.85]  TABLE 3  Subjective Instrument Rankings by Five Amputators
              Tree Hopper  6     3    67%     2     [0.5–7.996]  Knife/Tool                Points  Rank   p Value
              Victorinox   5     4    56%    1.25  [0.336–4.65]  Which knife performed the complete amputation the best?
              SOG          4     5    44%     0.8  [0.2148–2.979]  Leatherman multitool     1.4      1     .001
                                                                 Treehopper hunting knife   2.2      2
              The success of amputation was associated with the limb tested:
              83% (15/18) of amputation attempts on the upper limbs were   Victorinox Rescue tool  2.4  3
              successful compared with a 39% (7/18) success rate in the   SOG Fixed blade    4       4
              lower limbs. None of the knives was successful in severing the   Which serrated saw blade cut through bone the best?
              femur in 2 minutes. In contrast, the distal tibia/fibula and the   Leatherman multitool  1.4  1  .001
              distal radius/ulna were amputated successfully 100% (5/5) of   Treehopper hunting knife  2.0  2
              the time regardless of the tool used. The proximal radius/ulna   Victorinox Rescue tool  2.8  3
              and proximal humerus were amputated in 75% of attempts   SOG Fixed blade       4       4
              (3/4 each). The distal humerus was amputated in 80% of at-  Which knife was the most ergonomically comfortable to amputate
              tempts (4/5). The proximal tibia/fibula was amputated in 40%   with?
              of attempts (2/5).                                 Victorinox Rescue tool     2.2      1     .73
                                                                 SOG fixed blade            2.2      1
              Of the extremity locations amputated, the Leatherman mul-
              titool and the Tree Hopper folding field hunting knife were   Leatherman multitool  2.8  2
              able to complete all six amputations; however, the Tree Hop-  Treehopper hunting knife  2.8  2
              per failed in a second attempt to amputate the proximal tibia/  Which knife cut through soft tissue the best?
              fibula. The Victorinox Swiss Rescue Knife also failed in the at-  Victorinox Rescue tool  2.4  1  .98
              tempt on the proximal tibia/fibula and the proximal humerus.   Treehopper hunting knife  2.6  2
              The SOG Pentagon fixed blade failed on the proximal tibia/  Leatherman multitool  2.6  2
              fibula, the proximal forearm, and on a second attempt of the   SOG fixed blade  2.6    2
              distal humerus.
                                                                 Which knife performed the complete amputation the best?
                                                                 Leatherman multitool       1.4      1     .001
              Success and failure appear to be related to the cadaver’s limb
              diameter and not to the operators’ abilities, sex, or body hab-  Treehopper hunting knife  2.2  2
              itus/height. The Leatherman multitool amputated all limbs     Victorinox Rescue tool  2.4  3
              < 10.8 cm (SD, 0.5 cm) in diameter. The TreeHopper success-  SOG Fixed blade   4       4
              fully amputated limbs < 10.8 cm (SD, 0.5 cm) in diameter but
              failed on the proximal tibia/fibula on a second amputation at-  Discussion
              tempt. The Victorinox Swiss Army Rescue Tool amputated all
              limbs measuring < 8.5 cm (SD, 0.3 cm) in diameter. The SOG   A field surgical amputation can be a life-saving procedure
              fixed-blade knife amputated limbs < 7.4 cm (SD, 0.8 cm) in   for a patient requiring extrication and extraction. Our study
              diameter and was variable with larger diameters, amputating   demonstrates that human cadaver distal limb (radius/ulna and
              in one of three attempts limbs 8.5 cm (SD, 0.3 cm) in diameter.   tibia/fibula) amputations are possible with select hand tools
              None of the tools was able to amputate the distal or proximal     within 2 minutes. The diameter of the limb was the strongest
              femur.                                             determinate regarding successful amputation versus failure.

                                                                      Knives and Multitools for Cadaveric Limb Amputation  |  73
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80