Page 26 - 2020 JSOM Winter
P. 26

Operations Command had the highest rate of overall adher-  2020;20(1):101–111
          ence, but rates were still low (68.5%). Medical officers had   Canine Tactical Combat Casualty Care (K9TCCC) Guidelines
          the highest rates of overall administration. The low rates of   Edwards TH, Palmer LE, Baxter RL, Sager TC, Coisman JG,
          administration and adherence persisted across all subgroups.   Brown JC, George C, McGraw AC
          Conclusion: Rates of analgesia administration remained low
          overall and in subgroup analyses. Medical officers appeared   ABSTRACT: First introduced in 1996, Tactical Combat Casu-
          to have higher rates of compliance with TCCC guidelines   alty Care (TCCC) redefined prehospital, point-of-injury (POI),
          for analgesia administration, but overall adherence to TCCC   battlefield trauma care for the human combat casualty. Today,
          guidelines was low. Future research will be aimed at finding   many consider TCCC as one of the most influential inter-
          methods to improve administration and adherence rates.  ventions for reducing combat-related case fatality rates from
                                                             preventable deaths in human combat casualties. Throughout
          Keywords:  analgesia;  combat;  compliance;  military;  pain;   history, Military Working Dogs (MWDs) have proved and
          prehospital; Tactical Combat Casualty Care         continue to prove themselves as force multipliers in the suc-
                                                             cess of many military operations. Since the start of the Global
          2019;19(3):31–44                                   War on Terror in 2001, these elite canine operators have ex-
          Management of Hemorrhage From Craniomaxillofacial Inju-  perienced an upsurge in combat-related deployments, placing
          ries and Penetrating Neck Injury in Tactical Combat Casualty   them at a higher risk for combat-related injuries. Until recently,
          Care: iTClamp Mechanical Wound Closure Device TCCC   consensus- based Canine-TCCC (K9TCCC) guidelines for POI
          Guidelines Proposed Change 19-04 06 June 2019  Onifer DJ,   battlefield trauma care did not exist for the MWD, leaving a
          McKee JL, Faudree LK, Bennett BL, Miles EA, Jacobsen T,   critical knowledge gap significantly jeopardizing MWD sur-
          Morey JK, Butler FK                                vival. In 2019, the Canine Combat Casualty Care Commit-
                                                             tee was formed as an affiliate of the Committee on Tactical
          ABSTRACT: The 2012 study Death on the battlefield (2001-
          2011) by Eastridge et al.1 demonstrated that 7.5% of the pre-  Combat Casualty Care  with the intent of developing evi-
          hospital deaths caused by potentially survivable injuries were   dence-based, best practice K9TCCC guidelines. Modeled after
          due to external hemorrhage from the cervical region. The in-  the same principles of the human TCCC, K9TCCC focuses on
          creasing use of Tactical Combat-Casualty Care (TCCC) and   simple, evidence-based, field-proven medical interventions to
          other medical interventions have dramatically reduced the   eliminate preventable deaths and to improve MWD survival.
          overall rate of combat-related mortality in US forces; how-  Customized for the battlefield, K9TCCC uniquely adapts the
          ever, uncontrolled hemorrhage remains the number one cause   techniques of TCCC to compensate for canine-specific ana-
          of potentially survivable combat trauma. Additionally, the   tomic and physiological differences.
          use of personal protective equipment and adaptations in the   Keywords: canine; military working dog; Tactical Combat
          weapons used against US forces has caused changes in the   Casualty Care; prehospital care; trauma
          wound distribution patterns seen in combat trauma. There
          has been a significant proportional increase in head and neck   2020;20(2):95–103
          wounds, which may result in difficult to control hemorrhage.   Quality Assurance in Tactical Combat Casualty Care for Med-
          More than 50% of combat wounded personnel will receive a   ical Personnel Training 16 April 2020  Greydanus DJ, Hass-
          head or neck wound. The iTClamp (Innovative Trauma Care   mann LL, Butler FK
          Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) is the first and only hem-
          orrhage control device that uses the hydrostatic pressure of   ABSTRACT:  At present,  however, there  is no  systematic,
          a hematoma to tamponade bleeding  from an injured  vessel   comprehensive quality assurance program for TCCC training
          within a wound. The iTClamp is US Food and Drug Admin-  throughout the DoD. Individual courses and instructors may
          istration (FDA) approved for use on multiple sites and works   or may not use all of the materials in the JTS-approved cur-
          in all compressible areas, including on large and irregular   riculum; they may or may not add content that is not part of
          lacerations. The iTClamp’s unique design makes it ideal for   the JTS curriculum; and they may or may not add additional
          controlling external hemorrhage in the head and neck region.   training in the form of advanced simulation, hands-on training
          The iTClamp has been demonstrated effective in over 245 field   with moulaged casualties, graded trauma lanes, or live- tissue
          applications. The device is small and lightweight, easy to ap-  training. A recent pilot appraisal of four Tactical Combat
          ply, can be used by any level of first responder with minimal   Casualty  Care  for  Medical  Personnel  (TCCC-MP)  training
          training, and facilitates excellent skills retention. The iTClamp   courses found that TCCC-MP courses are not presenting all
          reapproximates wound edges with four pairs of opposing nee-  of the course material recommended by the Joint Trauma
          dles. This mechanism of action has demonstrated safe appli-  System (JTS), despite TCCC training having been mandated
          cation for both the patient and the provider, causes minimal   by the Department of Defense (DoD) for all US military per-
          pain, and does not result in tissue necrosis, even if the device   sonnel. Some of the omitted material is essential to ensuring
          is left in place for extended periods. The Committee on TCCC   that students are fully prepared to perform TCCC on the bat-
          recommends the use of the iTClamp as a primary treatment   tlefield. Further, there was incorrect messaging presented in
          modality, along with a CoTCCC-recommended hemostatic   the  TCCC-MP courses that were appraised, some of which, if
          dressing and direct manual pressure (DMP), for hemorrhage   actually reflected in the care provided on the battlefield, would
          control in craniomaxillofacial injuries and penetrating neck   likely result in adverse casualty  outcomes. Other aspects  of
          injuries with external hemorrhage.                 the TCCC messaging presented in the appraised courses that
                                                             is not at present part of the JTS-approved curriculum might,
          Keywords: craniomaxillofacial injury; penetrating neck injury;   however, be appropriate for inclusion into the TCCC Guide-
          junctional hemorrhage; compressible hemorrhage; hemor-  lines  and  the  course  curriculum.  Examples  of  material  that
          rhage control; iTClamp; TCCC; Tactical Combat Casualty   should be considered for incorporation into the TCCC curric-
          Care                                               ulum include modifying the method of tranexamic acid (TXA)



          24  |  JSOM   Volume 20, Edition 4 / Winter 2020
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31