Page 61 - JSOM Fall 2020
P. 61

FIGURE 6  Occlusion pressures versus circumference correlations.

               (A)                                                                                          (B)




























              On all panels, data points represent means of the triplicates; the y-axis has occlusion pressures (mmHg), and the x-axis has limb circumferences
              (cm). (A) Combined thigh occlusion pressures versus circumference, r  = 0.24 with P < .0001. (B) Arm occlusion pressures versus circumference,
                                                             2
              r  = 0.027 with P = .38.
              2
              TABLE 2  Thigh Occlusion Pressures With Different Tourniquets
                                                                Occlusion Pressure (mmHg)
              Tourniquet            Minimum  5th Percentile  25th Percentile  Median  75th Percentile  95th Percentile  Maximum
              OMNA Marine Tourniquet   275       289         337       348        380         451         521
              (n = 60)
              Tactical RMT (n = 15)   264        264         302       315        352         383         383
              SOFTT-W 3 (n = 15)      284        284         325       350        387         447         447
              C-A-T7 (n = 15)*        344        344         389       403        483         624         624
                                                               Completion Pressure (mmHg)
              OMNA Marine Tourniquet   320       349         392       414        456         523         588
              (n = 60)
              Tactical RMT (n = 14)   319        319         350       365        385         448         448
              SOFTT-W 3 (n = 12)      241        241         307       371        449         599         599
              C-A-T7 (n = 10)*        447        447         503       558        694         851         851
              All applications were mid-thigh on bare skin with subjects sitting in a chair, the thigh parallel to the floor with the lower leg at a 90° angle, and
              instruction to maintain the thigh in a relaxed state. Values are from the means of triplicates.
              Tactical RMT, Tactical Ratcheting Medical Tourniquet; SOFTT-W 3, Generation 3 SOF  Tactical Tourniquet–Wide; C-A-T7, Generation 7
                                                                            ®
              Combat Application Tourniquet
              *C-A-T7 pressures are higher than each other tourniquet (P < .0001).
              Sources: Tactical RMT, SOFTT-W3, and C-A-T7 data from reference 16 is used with permission from Journal of Special Operations Medicine;
              Clothing effects on limb tourniquet application. Authors; Wall P, Buising C, Hingtgen E, Smith H, Renner CH; J. Spec Oper Med. 2020 Summer;
              20(2):83–94.

              needing to hold the tourniquet against sliding also allows the   As noted, there were statistically significant but not impressive
              redirect buckle to behave as a moving pulley for a mechani-  correlations between secured pressures and clicks to occlusion
              cal advantage benefit over a completely stationary redirect (a   and very weak correlations between occlusion pressures and
              redirect that is prevented from moving in concert with tissue   clicks. Essentially, the number of clicks needed to reach occlu-
              compression). The slightly tacky section is not of sufficient   sion can be used as an indicator of the quality of the secured
              length to negatively influence pulling the strap through the re-  pressure achieved during an application, but a set number of
                        16
              direct buckle.  We found this design feature (a short distance   clicks absolutely should not be suggested as likely to indicate
              of slight tackiness) highly advantageous in our laboratory set-  an occlusive application.
              ting that, because of the use of the pressure measuring sys-
              tem, included initial positioning of the tourniquet on the limb   Within a given subject, the median occlusion pressure coeffi-
              by a researcher. How or whether the design feature would   cient of variation was 7.7% (thigh) and 7.0% (arm). This is an
              translate to an application advantage in other settings is of    indicator of the combination of the consistency of the pressure
              interest.                                          at which occlusion occurred in each subject, the resolution of

                                                                              OMNA Marine Tourniquet Self-Application  |  59
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66