Page 64 - JSOM Winter 2017
P. 64

Postmission Follow-Up                              Disclosure
                                                             The authors have nothing to disclose.
          There will undoubtedly be a great sense of satisfaction upon
          returning from your mission, and your team will be ready   Author Contributions
          to get back to their families and their typical clinical duties.   All authors contributed extensively to this work through their
          However, it is important to remember that the mission is not   experiences on multiple humanitarian and military related de-
          over when your team returns home. Setting aside some time   ployments throughout their careers. All authors read and ap-
          after  your  return  home  for  postmission  follow-up  tasks  is   proved the final version of the manuscript.
          invaluable. First and foremost, verify the safe return of your
          team, especially if everyone was unable to be placed on the   References
          same travel schedule. Also, ensure the safe return of any equip-    1.  Casey KM. The global impact of surgical volunteerism. Surg
          ment or supplies used on the mission (e.g., ultrasound device,   Clin Am. 2007;87:949–960.
          laryngoscopes) that must be returned to your hospital. The an-    2.  Boston M, Horlbeck D. Humanitarian surgical missions:
          esthesia team lead should check with the lead surgeon to verify   planning for success. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153
          there are not any unresolved issues from their end. Given the   (3):320–325.
          benefits of surgical missions going to the same location each     3.  Welling DR, Ryan JM, Burris DG, et al. Seven sins of humani-
          year, 10–12  the anesthesia team lead should provide the surgical   tarian medicine. World J Surg. 2010;34:466–470.
          team lead with a recommendation on whether  returning to     4.  Schneider WJ, Politis GD, Glsun AK, et al. Volunteers in plas-
          this particular location is feasible from an anesthetic-provider   tic surgery guidelines for providing surgical care for children
          perspective.                                          in the less developed world. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:
                                                                2477–2486.
                                                               5.  Sheider WJ, Migliori MR, Gosain AK, et al. Volunteers in
          Recommendations                                       plastic surgery guidelines for providing surgical care in the
                                                                less developed world: part II. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:
          With proper planning and execution, anesthetic support of   216e–222e.
          humanitarian surgical missions is a very manageable task that     6.  Pluad D, Blaschke G, Jones S, et al. A case of malignant hyper-
          can result in an extremely satisfying sense of accomplishment   thermia in a child encountered during a humanitarian assis-
          and a rewarding experience both for the team who deliver   tance mission to the Philippines. Mil Med. 2008;173:805–808.
          care and the patients who receive care. We think this guideline     7.  Wilson JE, Barras WP. Advances in anesthesia delivery in the
          should be used as a reference document by any anesthesia pro-  deployed setting. US Army Med Dep J. 2016;April-September;
                                                                62–65.
          fessional tasked with planning and supporting a humanitarian     8.  Powell AC, Casey K, Liewehr DJ, et al. Results of a national
          surgical mission. Figure 4 can be used as a checklist of all of   survey of surgical resident interest in international experi-
          the key items discussed in this article to prepare for an upcom-  ence, electives and volunteerism. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:
          ing humanitarian surgical mission.                    304–312.
                                                               9.  Jense, RJ, Howe CR, Bransford RJ, et al. University of Wash-
          Disclaimer                                            ington orthopedic resident experience and interest in devel-
          The view(s) expressed herein are those of the authors and do   oping an international humanitarian rotation. Am J Orthop.
          not reflect the official policy or position of the San Antonio   2009;208:38:E18–E20.
          Military Medical Center, the US Air Force Medical Service,   10.  Barrs DM, Mueller SP, Worndall DB, et al. Results of a hu-
          the US Army Medical Corps, the US Air Force Office of the   manitarian otologic and audiologic project performed outside
          Surgeon General, the US Army Office of the Surgeon General,   the United States: lessons learned from the “Oye, Amigos!”
                                                                project. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:722–732.
          the Department of the Air Force, the Department of the Army,   11.  Horlbeck D, Boston M, Balough B, et al. Humanitarian oto-
          the Department of Defense, or the US Government.      logic missions: long-term surgical results. Otolaryngol Head
                                                                Neck Surg. 2009;140:559–565.
          Financial Disclosure                               12.  Pearce EC, Mainthia R, Freeman KL, et al. The usefulness of
          The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this   a yearly head and neck surgery trip to rural Kenya. Otolaryn-
          article.                                              gol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149:727–732.
          Funding
          No funding was provided for this article.






















          62  |  JSOM   Volume 17, Edition 4/Winter 2017
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69