Page 60 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Fall 2015
P. 60

Figure 1  Sample RFR skill matrix.
                                                                    Casualty
                     Hemorrhage Control   Airway       Chest Trauma  Extraction           DCR
                                Pressure      Surgical                     Hypothermia  Hypotensive
                 Tourniquet  Hemostatic  Dressing  NPA  Airway  Chest Seal  Decompression  Prevention  Resuscitation  TXA  Blood Products
          Ranger  Mastery  Proficiency Proficiency Proficiency Proficiency Proficiency  Proficiency  Mastery  Proficiency  Proficiency  Familiarization  Familiarization
          Medic   Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Proficiency  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery
          Physician   Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Proficiency  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery
          Assistant
          Physician   Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Proficiency  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery  Mastery
          Note: DCR, damage control resuscitation; NPA, nasopharyngeal airway; TXA, tranexamic acid.

          in turn, would reduce morbidity and mortality on the   ers who had helped implement the massively successful
            battlefield.  The success of the RFR model in minimiz-  American Heart Association (AHA) Chain of Survival
                   16
          ing potentially preventable prehospital mortality is evi-  model for cardiac arrest. 24
          dence based. The Ranger process-improvement program
          collected data on a total of 419 casualties over 7 years,   The civilian TECC guidelines, like TCCC in the military,
          revealing a 0% potentially preventable mortality rate in   provide a common operating language for trauma care
          the prehospital combat environment. 14             that accounts for the tactical and operational environ-
                                                             ment. The C-TECC Trauma Chain of Survival offers a
                                                             training and educational concept to engage all stakehold-
          Putting RFR in Play on American Streets:           ers critical to reducing potentially preventable mortality
          The C-TECC Chain of Survival
                                                             during AVIs. The execution of these steps depends on the
          Combat data clearly demonstrate that the rapid applica-  tactical  situation  as  well  as  the  participant’s  role  (e.g.,
          tion of a critical life-saving intervention, including threat   teacher, victim, patrol, paramedic). What is apparent
          mitigation, hemorrhage control, and rapid extraction,   from similar models (e.g., the AHA Chain of Survival)
          reduces potentially preventable death. 20–22  Further, the   is that the early links in the chain are critical for success.
          five key components of the RFR program also apply in   The RFR model offers evidence-based support for both
          dynamic, civilian AVIs.                            the TECC guidelines and a model for implementation.

          The original 2011 C-TECC recommendations articu-   The First Care Provider: Run, Hide, Fight . . . Treat
          lated the concept of the TECC Trauma Chain of Survival
          (Figure 2) to emphasize the requirement for a common   Civilian and military data demonstrate that decreas-
          operating framework that spans from point-of-injury   ing the time from point of injury to initial stabilizing
          care to definitive care.  The Chain of Survival concept   care reduces mortality.  In civilian AVIs and mass casu-
                                                                                20
                             23
          was based on input from C-TECC members who had     alty incidents, crowd management and casualty access
          previously served with the Rangers and civilian lead-  are critical and challenging tasks. Historically, first re-
                                                             sponder agencies have been taught techniques to mini-
          Figure 2  TECC Chain of Survival.                  mize bystander interference during response operations.
                                                             However, several recent events demonstrated that the
                                                             nonmedical provider can make a difference between life
                                                             and death. The term “bystander” fails to account for
                                                             the demonstrable and consistent actions of the civilian
                                                             population in times of tragedy; thus, C-TECC has ad-
                                                             opted use of “First Care Providers” (FCPs), described as
                                                             civilians at the scene of a traumatic event with the clos-
                                                             est  proximity  and,  thus,  earliest  potential  for  medical
                                                             intervention. 8,25–27

                                                             Since the ill-fated events of Columbine, response tactics
                                                             of police and paramedics have changed and much effort
                                                             has been focused on improving the response to events.
                                                                                                            28
                                                             However, at ground zero, law enforcement create secure
                                                             perimeters  to control  access to the scene, often limit-
          Note: ALS, Advanced Life Support; BLS, Basic Life Support; LEO, law   ing the  ability of  medical assets  to gain  proximity to
          enforcement officer.                               the wounded. While some fire and emergency medical



          48                                        Journal of Special Operations Medicine  Volume 15, Edition 3/Fall 2015
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65