Page 84 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2015
P. 84

Emergency Department Patients Support
                        the Use of Combat Medics in Their Clinical Care



                                    Steven G. Schauer, DO; Robert Mabry, MD;
                                   Shawn M. Varney, MD; Jeffrey T. Howard, PhD









          ABSTRACT
          Background: As US military combat operations draw   Keywords: medics, Combat; medics, Special Forces; patients,
          down in Afghanistan, the military health system will   emergency department; surveys
          shift focus to garrison- and hospital-based care. Main-
          taining combat medical skills while performing routine
          healthcare in military hospitals and clinics is a critical   INTRODUCTION
          challenge for Combat medics. Current regulations al-
          low for a wide latitude of Combat medic functions.   Background
          The Surgeon General considers combat casualty care
          a top priority. Combat medics are expected to provide   The US military has seen an unprecedented amount of
          sophisticated  care  under  the  extreme  circumstances   combat in the Joint Theater over the past decade. The
          of a hostile battlefield. Yet, in the relatively safe and   large number of combat injuries has placed an emphasis
          highly supervised setting of contiguous US-based mili-  on the importance of the Combat medic (68W) and Spe-
          tary hospitals, medics are rarely allowed to perform   cial Forces medic (18D) in care required to administer
          the procedures or administer medications they are ex-  lifesaving treatments at the point of injury (POI). For
          pected to use in combat. This study sought to deter-  the purpose of this paper, Combat medic refers to both
          mine patients’ opinions on the use of combat medics   the 68W and 18D military occupational specialties.
          in their healthcare. Methods: Patients in hospital emer-
          gency department (EDs) were offered anonymous sur-  Recent studies have highlighted the importance of con-
          veys. Examples of Combat medic skills were provided.   tinual training to maintain our Combat medic force in a
          Participants expressed agreement using the Likert   deployment-ready status.  Predeployment training has
                                                                                   1,2
          scale (LS), with scores ranging from “strongly agree”   been shown to be beneficial for Combat medic readi-
          (LS score, 1) to “strongly disagree” (LS score, 5). The   ness.  However, a limited amount of training can occur
                                                                 3
          study took place in the ED at Bayne-Jones Army Com-  using simulations and live-tissue models. Thus, clinical
          munity Hospital, Fort Polk, Louisiana. Surveys were   experience must be a priority in the garrison setting. Ide-
          offered to adult patients when they checked into the   ally, training would occur as an ongoing process rather
          ED or to adults with other patients. Results: A total of   than a short predeployment course. Ongoing critical
          280 surveys were completed and available for analysis.   care experience has been linked to improved patient
          Subjects agreed that Combat medic skills are impor-  outcomes.  Data suggest that there is poor adherence
                                                                      4
          tant for deployment (LS score, 1.4). Subjects agreed   to Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) medication
          that Combat medics should be allowed to perform    guidelines at the POI.  It appears unreasonable to expect
                                                                               5
          procedures (LS score, 1.6) and administer medications   that medics will perform a procedure or administer a
          (LS score, 1.6). Subjects would allow Combat medics   medication under hostile conditions that they have not
          to perform procedures (LS score, 1.7) and administer   been trained to do in a controlled setting.
          medications (LS score, 1.7) to them or their families.
          Subjects agreed that Combat medic activities should be   Importance
          a core mission for military treatment facilities (MTFs)
          (LS score, 1.6). Conclusion: Patients support the use of   US Army Medical Command (MEDCOM) regulation
          Combat medics during clinical care. Patients agree that   40-50 and Army regulation 40-68 outline the use of
          Combat medic use should be a core mission for MTFs.   Combat medics in the clinical setting. The regulations
          Further research is needed to optimize Combat medic   allow significant latitude in provider discretion on tasks
          integration into patient healthcare.               that can be delegated to the medics. However, there



                                                          74
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89