Page 102 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2015
P. 102

Health are thanked for collecting, collating, and identi-  14.  Smith J, Hodgetts T, Mahoney P, et al. Trauma governance
          fying the JTTR data used in this report.              in the UK defence medical services. J R Army Med Corps.
                                                                2007;153:239–242.
                                                             15.  MacKenzie EJ, Shapiro S, Eastham JN. The Abbreviated In-
          Disclaimer                                            jury Scale and Injury Severity Score. Levels of inter- and intra-
                                                                rater reliability. Med Care. 1985;23:823–835.
          This report presents independent research supported   16.  Ringdal KG, Skaga NO, Hestnes M, et al. Abbreviated Injury
          in  part  by the  National  Institute  for  Health  Research   Scale: not a reliable basis for summation of injury severity in
          (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Re-   trauma facilities? Injury. 2013;44: 691–699.
          search Centre (a partnership among University Hospitals   17.  Neale R, Rokkas P, McClure RJ. Interrater reliability of in-
          Birmingham National Health Service [NHS] Founda-      jury coding in the Queensland Trauma Registry. Emerg Med
                                                                (Fremantle). 2003;15:38–41.
          tion Trust, the University of Birmingham, and the Royal   18.  Zoltie N, de Dombal FT. The hit and miss of ISS and TRISS.
          Centre for Defence Medicine). The views expressed are   Yorkshire Trauma Audit Group. BMJ. 1993;307:906–909.
          those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the   19.  Smith IM. Coagulopathy after military trauma: the impact
          UK Ministry of Defence, US Department of Defense,     of a pre-hospital major haemorrhage protocol [dissertation].
          the NHS, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health.    Swansea, Wales: Swansea University; 2012.
                                                             20.  Brodie S, Hodgetts TJ, Ollerton J, et al. Tourniquet use in
                                                                combat  trauma:  UK  military  experience.  J  R  Army Med
          Disclosure                                            Corps. 2007;153:310–313.
          The authors have no financial relationships relevant to   21.  Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Report-
                                                                ing Reliability  and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were pro-
          this article to disclose.                             posed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:96–106.
                                                             22.  Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing
          References                                            agreement between two  methods  of clinical measurement.
                                                                Lancet. 1986;327:307–310.
            1.  Russell RJ, Hodgetts TJ, McLeod J, et al. The role of trauma   23.  Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY:
             scoring in developing trauma clinical governance in the De-  John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002.
             fence Medical Services. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.   24.  Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agree-
             2011;366:171–191.                                  ment for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
            2.  Stevenson M, Segui-Gomez M, Lescohier I, et al. An overview   25.  Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrom C, et al. MethComp: func-
             of the injury severity score and the new injury severity score.   tions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies.
             Inj Prev. 2001;7:10–13.                            R package version 1.22. 2013. http://CRAN.R-project.org/
            3.  Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E. AIS 2005: a contemporary injury   package=MethComp. Accessed 10 June 2014.
             scale. Injury. 2006;37:1083–1091.               26.  Gamer M, Lemon J, Fellows I, et al. irr: various coefficients of
            4.  Gennarelli  TA, Wodzin E,  eds.  Abbreviated Injury Scale   interrater reliability and agreement. R package version 0.84.
             2005: update 2008. Barrington, IL: Association for the Ad-  2012. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr. Accessed 29
             vancement of Automotive Medicine; 2008.            October 2014.
            5.  Champion HR, ed. Military Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005.   27.  Mikhail  JN,  Harris  YD,  Sorensen  VJ.  Injury  severity  scor-
             Silver Springs, MD: SimQuest LLC; 2007.            ing: influence of trauma surgeon involvement on accuracy.
            6.  Champion HR, Holcomb JB, Lawnick MM, et al. Improved   JTrauma Nurs. 2003;10:43–47.
             characterization of combat injury. J Trauma. 2010;68:1139–   28.  Waydhas C, Nast-Kolb D, Trupka A, et al. [Trauma scores: re-
             1150.                                              producibility and reliability]. Unfallchirurg. 1992;95:67–70.
            7.  Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, et al. The injury severity   29.  Davies TJ, Nadin MN, McArthur DJ, et al. Hospex 2008. J R
             score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries   Army Med Corps. 2008;154:195–201.
             and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14:187–196.  30.  Joint Committee on Surgical Training. The intercollegiate sur-
            8.  Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury sever-  gical curriculum. October 2013. www.iscp.ac.uk/documents
             ity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.   /syllabus_GS_2013.pdf. Accessed 16 November 2014.
             J Trauma. 1997;43:922–925.                      31.  Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 3rd ed. London,
            9.  Balogh Z, Offner PJ, Moore EE, et al. NISS predicts postin-  UK: Arnold; 2003.
             jury multiple organ failure better than the ISS.  J Trauma.
             2000;48:624–627.
          10.  Balogh ZJ, Varga E, Tomka J, et al. The new injury sever-
             ity score is a better predictor of extended hospitalization and   Maj Smith is a general surgical resident in the UK Army
             intensive care unit admission than the injury severity score in   Reserve, with deployed surgical experience in both Iraq and
             patients with multiple orthopaedic injuries. J Orthop Trauma.   Afghanistan. He was previously a prehospital squadron sec-
             2003;17:508–512.                                ond-in-command. He is currently a Clinical Research Fellow
          11.  Brenneman FD, Boulanger BR, McLellan BA, et al. Measuring   at the Royal Centre for Defence Medicine and the NIHR Sur-
             injury severity: time for a change. J Trauma. 1998;44: 580–582.  gical Reconstruction & Microbiology Research Centre, Queen
          12.  Harwood PJ, Giannoudis PV, Probst C, et al; Polytrauma   Elizabeth Hospital; and is affiliated with the 205 (Scottish)
             Study Group of the German Trauma Society. Which AIS based   Field Hospital in Glasgow, UK. He may be contacted c/o
             scoring system is the best predictor of outcome in orthopaedic   NIHR SRMRC, Office 4.36, East Block, 4th Floor, Research
             blunt trauma patients? J Trauma. 2006;60:334–340.
          13.  Sullivan T, Haider A, DiRusso SM, et al. Prediction of mor-  & Development—University Hospitals Birmingham NHS
             tality in pediatric trauma patients: new injury severity score   Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Queen Eliza-
             outperforms injury severity score in the severely injured.  J   beth Medical Centre, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK. E-mail:
             Trauma. 2003;55:1083–1087.                      iainmsmith@doctors.net.uk.



          92                                    Journal of Special Operations Medicine  Volume 15, Edition 2/Summer 2015
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107