Page 85 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2014

26. Tharion WJ, Shukitt-Hale B, Lieberman HR. Caffeine ef- 41. Pemrick MD. Physical fitness and the 75th Ranger Regi-
fects on marksmanship during high-stress military train- ment: the components of physical fitness and the Ranger
ing with 72 hour sleep deprivation. Aviat Space Environ mission. Master’s thesis. Fort Leavenworth, KS: U.S.
Med. 2003;74:309–314. Army Command and General Staff College; 1999.
27. Rosekind MR, Smith RM, Miller DL, et al. Alertness 42. Larsen B, Netto K, Aisbett B. The effect of body armor
management: strategic naps in operational settings. J on performance, thermal stress, and exertion: a critical
Sleep Res. 1995;4(S2):62–66. review. Mil Med. 2011;176:1265–1273.
28. Friedl KE, Mays MZ, Kramer TR, Shippee RL. Acute 43. Ricciardi R, Deuster PA, Talbot LA. Metabolic demands
recovery of physiological and cognitive function in U.S. of body armor on physical performance in simulated con-
Army Ranger students in a multistressor field experiment. ditions. Mil Med. 2008;173:817–824.
Paper presented at the RTO HFM Workshop on “The Ef- 44. Hasselquist L, Bensel CK, Corner B, et al. Understanding
fect of Prolonged Military Activities in Man. Physiological the physiological, biomechanical, and performance ef-
and Biochemical Changes. Possible Means of Rapid Recu- fects of body armor use. In Proceedings of the Army Sci-
peration,” Oslo, Norway, 3–5 April 1995, RTO MP-042. ence Conference (26th), Orlando, Florida, 1–4 December
29. Thorlund JB, Jakobsen O, Madsen T, et al. Changes in 2008.
muscle strength and morphology after muscle unload- 45. DeMario M, Onate J, Swain D, et al. Physical perfor-
ing in Special Forces missions. Scand J Med Sci Sports. mance decrements in military personnel wearing personal
2011;21:e56–e63. protective equipment (PPE).Paper presented at the RTO
30. Harman EA, Gutekunst DJ, Frykman PN, et al. Predic- Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Symposium,
tion of simulated battlefield physical performance from Sofia, Bulgaria, 5–7 October 2009, RTO-MP-HFM-181.
field-expedient tests. Mil Med. 2008;173:36–41. 46. Sell TC, Chu Y, Abt JP, et al. Minimal additional weight
31. Parker MG, Bennett MJ, Hieb MA, et al. Strength re- of combat equipment alters air assault soldier’s landing
sponse in human femoris muscle during 2 neuromuscu- biomechanics. Mil Med. 2010;175:41–47.
lar electrical stimulation programs. J Orthop Sports Phys 47. Task Force Devil Combined Arms Assessment Team (Devil
Ther. 2003;33:719–726. CAAT). The modern warrior’s combat load: dismounted
32. Fitts RH, Romatowski JG, Peters JR, et al. The deleteri- operations in Afghanistan. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Cen-
ous effects of bed rest on human skeletal muscle fibers are ter for Army Lessons Learned, U.S. Army Natick Soldier
exacerbated by hypercortisolemia and ameliorated by di- Center; 2004.
etary supplementation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007; 48. Seay JF, Hasselquist L, Bensel CK. Carrying a rifle with
293:C313–C320. both hands affects upper body transverse plane kinemat-
33. U.S. Army Maneuver Center of Excellence. Ranger train- ics and pelvis-trunk coordination. Ergonomics. 2011;54:
ing brigade. https://www.benning.army.mil/infantry/rtb/. 187–196.
34. Sporiš G, Harasin D, Bok D, et al. Effects of a training 49. Rodriguez-Soto AE, Jaworski R, Jensen A, et al. Effect of
program for special operations battalion on Soldiers’ fit- load carriage on lumbar spine kinematics. Spine. 2013;
ness characteristics. J Strength Conditioning Res. 2012; 38:E783–E791.
26:2872–2882. 50. Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load car-
35. Burke WP, Dyer FN. Effects of Ranger training in selected riage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medi-
measures of strength and cardiovascular fitness. Alexan- cal aspects. Mil Med. 2004;169:45–56.
dria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral 51. Ballard TL, Clapper JA, Specker BL, et al. Effect of pro-
and Social Sciences; 1980:Research Report 1353. tein supplementation during a 6-mo strength and con-
36. Prusaczyk WK, Stuster JW, Goforth HW Jr, et al. Physical ditioning program on insulin-like growth factor 1and
demands of U.S. Navy Sea-Air-Land (SEAL) Operations. markers of bone turnover in young adults. Am J Clin
San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research Center; 1995:Re- Nutr. 2005;81:1442–1448.
port No. 95-24. 52. Ricciardi R, Deuster PA, Talbot LA. Effects of gender
37. Hyde D, Thomas JR, Schrot J, et al. Quantification of Spe- and body adiposity on physiological responses to physi-
cial Operations mission-related performance: operational cal work while wearing body armor. Mil Med. 2007;172:
evaluation of physical measures. Bethesda, MD: Naval 743–748.
Medical Research and Development Command; 1997: 53. Daube JR. Rucksack paralysis. JAMA. 1969;208:2447–
Report NMRI 97-01. 2452.
38. Nindl BC, Friedl KE, Frykman PN, et al. Physical perfor- 54. Orr R, Pope R, Johnston V, Coyle J. Load carriage and
mance and metabolic recovery among lean, healthy men its force impact. Austral Defence Force J. 2011;185(Jul–
following a prolonged energy deficit. Int J Sports Med. Aug):52–63.
1997;18:317–324. 55. Aharony S, Milgrom C, Wolf T, et al. Magnetic resonance
39. Knapik JJ, Harman EA, Steelman RA, et al. A systematic imaging showed no signs of overuse or permanent injury
review of the effects of physical training on load carriage to the lumbar sacral spine during a Special Forces training
performance. J Strength Conditioning Res. 2012;26:585– course. Spine J. 2008;8:578–583.
597. 56. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A. Applications man-
40. Williams AG, Rayson MP, Jones DA. Training diagno- ual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Cincinnati,
sis for a load carriage task. J Strength Conditioning Res. OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
2004;18:30–34. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and

Operational Stressors on Physical Performance and Countermeasures 77