Page 27 - JSOM Summer 2025
P. 27

TABLE 1  Studies Involving the Double-Trunk Mask (DTM)
              First author (year)   Study type  Comparison  Materials and methods             Results
              Farias (1991) 19  Prospective  NRM vs. tusk mask  • Low flow rate  FIO  with tusk mask greater than NRM
                                                                                   2
                                      (trunks 10cm)   • N=5
                                                      • Healthy subjects
              Hnatiuk (1998) 20  Prospective  NRM vs. tusk mask  • Low flow rate  NRM
                                      (corrugated tubing   • n=16                • PaO : 290mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                      10cm)           • Healthy subjects, mean age 30.4 y  Tusk mask
                                                      • O  flow rate: 15LPM      • PaO : 330mmHg
                                                         2                           2
                                                      • Low flow rate            NRM
                                                      • n=7                      • PaO : 293mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                                      • Mean age 68.1 y; pulmonary   Tusk mask
                                                        interstitial disease     • PaO : 378mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                                      • O  flow rate: 15LPM
                                                         2
              Bodur (2001) 13  Prospective   NC vs. DTM  • Low flow rate         NC
                            randomized   (trunks 38cm)  • N=55                   • PaO : 68mmHg
                                                                                     2
                            crossover                 • Intensive care patients  • PaCO : 41mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                                      • O  flow rate: 3.58LPM    DTM
                                                         2
                                                                                 • PaO : 152mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                                                                 • PaCO : 45mmHg
                                                                                      2
              Duprez (2021) 28  Prospective   NC vs. DTM  • Low flow rate        NC
                            randomized   (corrugated tubing   • N=15             • PaO : 60mmHg
                                                                                     2
                            crossover  15cm)          • Mean age 69 y            • PaCO : 39mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                                      • Intensive care patients  DTM
                                                      • O  flow rate: 5LPM       • PaO : 90mmHg
                                                         2                           2
                                                                                 • PaCO : 42mmHg
                                                                                      2
              Duprez (2022) 10  Prospective   NRM vs. DTM  • Low flow rate       NRM
                            randomized   (corrugated tubing   • N=22             • PaO : 70mmHg
                                                                                     2
                            crossover  15cm)          • Age 64, emergency care patients   • PaCO : 33mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                      (30 min)          (COVID-19)               DTM
                                                      • O  flow rate: 10 and 15LPM  • PaO : 85mmHg
                                                         2
                                                                                     2
                                                                                 • PaCO : 35mmHg
                                                                                      2
              Duprez (2022) 6  Bench study  Comparison between   • O  flow rate: N=82  DTM delivers highest FIO , followed by NRM,
                                                         2
                                                                                                 2
                                      different oxygen devices:  • 10–15LPM      then simple O  face mask, and lastly NC.
                                                                                         2
                                      NC, simple O  face   • Inspiratory flow rate: 22–45LPM
                                              2
                                      mask, NRM, DTM
              Poncin (2020) 17  Prospective   Assessment of the level   • Low flow rate  Using a DTM instead of NC allows the oxygen flow
                            randomized   of oxygen economy   • N=12              to be reduced from 5 to 1.5LPM while maintaining
                            crossover  achieved between DTM   • O  flow rate: 5LPM  the same level of oxygenation (PaO ). In this case,
                                                         2
                                                                                                      2
                                      and NC                                     the PaCO  level does not change clinically
                                                                                       2
              Thajunnisa (2022) 31  Prospective   Comparison: NRM and  • Low flow rate  Classical O  mask
                                                                                        2
                            randomized   DTM          • N=20                     • PaO : 186mmHg
                                                                                     2
                            crossover                 • Aged 18–70 y             • PaCO : 33mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                                      • O  flow rate: 10LPM      DTM
                                                         2
                                                                                 • PaO : 368mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                                                                 • PaCO : 33mmHg
                                                                                      2
              Poncin (2022) 16  Prospective   COVID-19 patients;   • Low flow rate  PaO  between NC and surgical mask increases
                                                                                    2
                            randomized   comparison between   • N=24             from 20mmHg, and 40mmHg between surgical
                            crossover  surgical mask over NC   • O  flow rate: 4.7LPM  mask over NC and DTM over NC
                                                         2
                                      and DTM over NC                            Note: On average, the PaCO  increased 2.4mmHg
                                                                                                  2
                                                                                 with the DTM.
              Duprez (2001) 11  Prospective   Comparison: NRM and  • Low flow rate  NRM
                            randomized   DTM          • N=40                     • PaO : 171mmHg
                                                                                     2
                            crossover                 • Intensive care patient   • PaCO : 39mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                                      • O  flow rate 8LPM        DTM
                                                         2
                                                                                 • PaO : 278mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                                                                 • PaCO : 41mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                      Comparison: NC and   • Low flow rate       CN
                                      DTM: O  flow rate:   • N=40                • PaO : 89mmHg
                                           2
                                                                                     2
                                      3LPM            • Intensive care patients  • PaCO : 41mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                                                                 DTM
                                                                                 • PaO : 154mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                                                                 • PaCO : 43mmHg
                                                                                      2
              Zellag (2021) 18  Prospective   Intensive care patients;   • Low flow rate  For the same O  flow, compared to NC, on
                                                                                          2
                            randomized   comparison: NC and   • N=100            average, DTM increases SpO  by 4%.
                                                                                                  2
                            crossover  DTM            • Mean age 67 y
                                                      • O  flow rate: 6LPM
                                                         2
              Duprez (2019) 29  Prospective   Mean ROX index 6.3;   HFNC         HFNC
                            randomized   intensive care patients;   • N=15       • PaO : 63mmHg
                                                                                     2
                            crossover  comparison: HFNC and  • Mean age 67 y     • PaCO : 32mmHg
                                                                                      2
                                      HFNC+DTM FIO    • Gas flow rate: 51LPM     HFNC+DTM
                                                 2
                                                                                 • PaO : 88mmHg
                                                                                     2
                                                                                 • PaCO : 35mmHg
                                                                                      2
              Duprez (2022) 32  Bench study  FIO  administered via   HFNC        When inspiration flow rate increases, the difference
                                        2
                                      the upper airways and   • Flow: 40–60LPM   between programmed and measured FIO  increases
                                                                                                          2
                                      the effect of DTM on the  • FIO : 60%/80%/100%  in the upper airways. In this case, DTM can
                                                          2
                                      actual FIO  delivered.                     decrease this difference.
                                             2
              FIO  = fraction of inspired oxygen; HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula; LPM = liters per minute; NC = nasal cannula; NRM = non-rebreathing mask; PaO  = partial
                                                                                                           2
                2
              pressure of oxygen, arterial; PaCO  = partial pressure of carbon dioxide, arterial; SpO  = oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry.
                                   2
                                                                  2
                                                                          Double-Trunk Mask for Efficient Oxygen Delivery  |  25
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32