Page 27 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2016
P. 27

Preliminary Measures of Instructor Learning

                                  in Teaching Junctional Tourniquet Users



                                      John F. Kragh Jr, MD; James K. Aden 3rd, PhD;
                                    Stacy A. Shackelford, MD; Michael A. Dubick, PhD





              ABSTRACT

              Background: The objective of the present study was to   of data available after completion of another study.  We
                                                                                                             1
              assess the effect of instructor learning on student perfor-  used a manikin (Combat Ready Clamp Trainer Manikin;
              mance in use of junctional tourniquets. Methods: From   Operative Experience, Inc., http://operativeexperience
              a convenience sample of data available after another   .com) that allowed for assessment of bleeding control
              study, we used a manikin for assessment of control of   from a right groin gunshot wound. Blood loss was mea-
              bleeding from a right groin gunshot wound. Blood loss   sured by the instructor while training users of junctional
              was measured by the instructor while training users.   tourniquet models. The capacity of the one instructor
              The data set represented a group of 30 persons taught   to affect the performance of users was a surrogate of
              one at a time. The first measure was a plot of mean   instructor learning.
              blood loss volumes for the sequential users. The second
              measure was a plot of the cumulative sum (CUSUM) of   The first measure was a plot of mean blood loss volumes
              mean blood loss (BL) volumes for users. Results: Mean   for the sequential users. The second measure was to plot
              blood loss trended down as the instructor gained experi-  a cumulative sum (CUSUM) of mean blood loss volumes
              ence with each newly instructed user. User performance   for users. CUSUM is a way to detect changes in trends
              continually improved as the instructor gained more ex-  and it looks at the sequential change in the cumulative
              perience with teaching. No plateau effect was observed   sum of data plotted by the sequence (i.e., the order of
              within the 30 users. The CUSUM plot illustrated a turn-  the data points acquired); the details are described in
              ing point or cusp at the seventh user. The prior portion   Equation 1.
              of the plot (users 1–7) had the greatest improvement;
              performance did not improve as much thereafter. The
              improvement after the seventh user was the only change   Equation 1  Description of the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM)
              detected in the instructor’s trend of performance. Con-  Technique Used
              clusions: The instructor’s teaching experience appeared                     k
              to directly affect user performance; in a model of junc-     CUSUM (k) =  ∑   (BL(i) – BL)
              tional hemorrhage, the volume of blood loss from the
              manikin during junctional tourniquet placement was a                       i=1
              useful metric of instructor learning. The CUSUM tech-  CUSUM entails summing a data sequence (∑ = summation). The cu-
              nique detected a small but meaningful change in trend   mulative  difference  of  each  data  point  from  the  benchmark  value,
              where the instructor learning curve was greatest while   in this case the mean value (BL) of the data set, is typically used in
              working with the first seven users.                monitoring change detection (e.g., a step in a time series). The dif-
                                                                 ference is calculated between each measurement (user mean) and the
                                                                 overall mean (mean of all users), and the differences are cumulatively
              Keywords: first aid; damage control; hemorrhage, preven-  summed. The summing begins with the initial (i) data point and pro-
              tion and control; shock; tourniquet; resuscitation; emer-  ceeds incrementally through each successive data point (called the kth
                                                                 value). If learning is absent, measurements do not deviate significantly
              gency medical services                             from  the  mean,  so  measurements  greater  than the  mean  and  those
                                                                 less than the mean roughly average each other out, and the CUSUM
                                                                 value would vary narrowly around the mean. If learning was pres-
                                                                 ent, measurements would trend away from the mean. CUSUM is an
                                                                 established technique that is useful in statistical monitoring to detect
                 he objective of this study was to assess the effect of   changes in trends of sequential data, such as in learning or quality
              Tinstructor learning on student performance in use of   control. CUSUM is typically portrayed in plots indicating if or where
                                                                 small changes are detected visually. Although CUSUM is uncommonly
              junctional tourniquets. We used a convenience sample   used in medicine, some investigators advocate for its increased use.


                                                              13
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32